Sponsor wants to get a divorce

[TANMEX]

Really?! 100% positive about him using his sponsor?

Infidelity is a pretty big pill to swallow for most people. I'm not condoning his behavior, but I can certainly empathize with the pain it must have created.

Who are we to judge how he chooses to deal with that pain?

Not sure she was referring to infidelity .

 

[TANMEX]

I sincerely hope that you simply misread the post before commenting this.
The sponsor cheated on him. He DID NOT. So not sure how you can be 100% sure that he used her to get PR.

she said she bad things , not sure what she meant , infidelity is a big deal , if that is the case .

 

[WaitingSince2012]

she said she bad things , not sure what she meant , infidelity is a big deal , if that is the case .

You need to go back and read. She posted that she cheated on him.

 

[canuck_in_uk]

He cannot. 1. he will lose his conditional PR, and this what he does not want. 2. HE abuses the kid and the wife.

Her cheating on him does not give him any rights to abuse his wife and a kid. If he is not happy - he should divorce her but not to abuse her. But.. see #1.

For her to initialize a divorce process is nothing to do with her cheating. The marriage did not work out. That was the reason she cheated. Now she wants to divorce him. That is it!

Seriously, read the posts properly. The OP asked if she could file for divorce based on the fact that SHE cheated. I explained that as per the law, she can't; only the spouse that's been cheated on, her husband, could file right away.

 

[alok4best]

she said she bad things , not sure what she meant , infidelity is a big deal , if that is the case .

Well, that happens when you skip posts while commenting.

 

[TANMEX]

Well, that happens when you skip posts while commenting.

Now I need to switch position , and I'm asking her to leave this poor man alone , even if she report him to CIC that won't cause him to lose his status .
G

 

[zardoz]

Of course, this "conditional PR" is exactly what the Liberal government wants to remove. Thereby ensuring that the sponsor has no way of escaping the 3 years sponsorship commitment.

 

[Regina]

It is harder for men to accept cheating than women.

Really? And why would that be?

And how long MUST she wait? A year? Two? Ten? He cannot overcome it? He is free to go!

 

[WaitingSince2012]

Really? And why would that be?

And how long MUST she wait? A year? Two? Ten? He cannot overcome it? He is free to go!

Because women are more forgiving than men. Maybe you should read up on the numerous studies that was done on this topic. I am not a psychologist so I would not know why it is harder for men to accept infidelity than women.

She is not exactly innocent in all of this. It is totally up to her how long she wants to wait. Cheating is not something you can just overcome, regardless of what led to the cheating. Asked anybody who has been cheated on. How is he free to go when there is a condition on his PR. Its like he is fighting a loosing battle anyways.

 

[barse]

I guess this is probably a fiction ;D

 

[dominokitty]

Because women are more forgiving than men. Maybe you should read up on the numerous studies that was done on this topic. I am not a psychologist so I would not know why it is harder for men to accept infidelity than women.

She is not exactly innocent in all of this. It is totally up to her how long she wants to wait. Cheating is not something you can just overcome, regardless of what led to the cheating. Asked anybody who has been cheated on. How is he free to go when there is a condition on his PR. Its like he is fighting a loosing battle anyways.

I guess the main issue is.. why would he want to stay in Canada at all, if he only moved there to be with his spouse? That's sort of the point of family sponsorship, isn't it? Keeping families together? Or did he have ulterior motives when moving to Canada?

He may lose his PR for violating the conditions due to the marriage breaking down, but so what? There's no reason to stay as a PR under family class if you have no family in Canada. It sucks, but it is what it is, regardless of the reasons why the marriage broke down.

 

[barse]

Well said.

+1

I agree too
Also remember - we heard the story from one side and even that was not upfront at first posting - just be aware that there are many people who want to get entry to Canada AND at the same time, equal number of people may not chose to leave behind their home. Any ways they should not continue living together AND LET JUSTICE BE DONE.

 

[kiwi2016]

I'm not really following this, however think there should be the conditional part about the sponsorship, if you could get divorced a year after living here, then I think it opens the door to more scams... Spousal sponsorship is technically so that the spouses can live together in one of their home countries, not specifically to just be in this country, it's to be with that person. It's just like Parent sponsorship, my mum is only coming here because of me... she would go anywhere in the world I decided to live, she really doesn't care much about the country I choose, it's me she wants to be with, and vice versa... SO, my point is, there should be conditions on spousal sponsorship...