Yes. It should be considered that way. All the best to the remaining folks \m/rcpcanada said:@ nhixon thank you for the updates, but I beleive still this will be considered before Dec 2nd only, becuase your case is DD. Please let me know if my understanding is wrong.
Updated... good luckmrscorpi87 said:Hi..
Could someone add me to the tracking sheet..
Application Sent: Sept 08, 2014
Application Received: September 15, 2014
Category: CEC
NOC code: 2211
Payment: Money Order
VO: CIO, Sydney NS
Country of Origin: India
Country of Residence: Canada
AOR Received : Waiting
I have a query so when I sent my application I checked the number of applications under my category and it was 18/200. I checked again today and it still shows 18. Is this the number of applications received or applications that have been issued with an AOR....Thanks in advance
Updated. Congrats.Saurabh_PR said:Got an alert for CC charged for 1100 CAD (spouse fee too).
Application recieved on 22nd Sep and CC charged on 8th Dec.
@ zareef, can you please update the sheet.
I think its the number of AOR's issued. Anyone else have any idea on it ?mrscorpi87 said:Hi..
Could someone add me to the tracking sheet..
Application Sent: Sept 08, 2014
Application Received: September 15, 2014
Category: CEC
NOC code: 2211
Payment: Money Order
VO: CIO, Sydney NS
Country of Origin: India
Country of Residence: Canada
AOR Received : Waiting
I have a query so when I sent my application I checked the number of applications under my category and it was 18/200. I checked again today and it still shows 18. Is this the number of applications received or applications that have been issued with an AOR....Thanks in advance
As the number has been changing lately I'm going to say it's the number of applications received, not AOR issued.nhixon said:I think its the number of AOR's issued. Anyone else have any idea on it ?
thanksmiglop2014 said:As the number has been changing lately I'm going to say it's the number of applications received, not AOR issued.
Either way, there's no need to worry because the numbers for all caps (including the overall cap) are too low and all applications sent before the 1st of January are going to be in the cap.
Winlali said:I found something last week.
Another administrative concern related to MI2 involves the need to keep track of the occupational caps. Both MI1 and MI2 allowed applicants to specify more than one NOC code for consideration, which was not a problem under MI1 because there were no limits on processing numbers. However, under MI2, with its various sub-caps, it is a substantial challenge. For example, it can be administratively challenging for CIO staff to manage applications if the applicant meets the criteria for multiple NOC codes. Because the initial cap counting is done at the clerical stage, when the file reaches the eligibility stage the cap for the particular NOC could be reached and the CIO officer would need to look at other eligible occupations. Similarly, if an applicant passes on eligibility and is included under the cap, but then has their credit card rejected, they need to be removed from the cap count, which is not easy under the current process.
www cic.gc.ca/english/resources/evaluation/min-instruct/section3.asp