- Payload of "cases" object (in dev console) showed "Completed" from the the day after application, which was a Sunday - leads me to believe there was possibly no human involved in finalising the application
This is consistent with numerous anecdotal reports in the last few months and even though it appears no one else here is willing to do the homework and make the ATI request for more, internal IRCC information about it (I'm old and tired, done my share of the legwork over the last decade and a half), it seems clear that IRCC has implemented automated decision making for online PR card applications meeting the triage criteria for low complexity . . . particularly if this follows the approach employed in pilot projects dating back to 2018.
As I have mentioned more than a few times of late, this most likely means IRCC is employing machine-learning and other AI tools in processing applications. This is great for those who have a low complex case. Fast. Compared to historical processing timelines, super fast.
Probably does not change much for the high complex case. These likely go into a non-routine processing stream such as a referral to the local office for investigation, or a referral for Secondary review, either tending to involve lengthy delays in reaching a final decision.
The impact is largely unknown for what is probably the bulk of PR card applications, no particular concern or issue so not high complex, but for whatever reason not meeting the triage criteria for "
low" complex which qualifies for an automated decision. The question is to what extent might limitations in staffing and other resource allocation result in this "
medium" complex group, which is quite likely most PR card applications, suffering lengthy processing timelines while those qualified for an automated decision benefit from an almost immediate approval and issuance of a new card.
This decision making is probably outside the scope of any review. The criteria will almost certainly not be available to the public. Moreover, the criteria itself is likely to evolve based on machine-learning, which could be prone to extending and expanding underlying institutional biases. Some PRs will benefit, getting a new PR card in three weeks or less, rather than ten weeks or more, for example. Others, perhaps many, may or may not benefit, or experience a detriment, a lot depending on how IRCC allocates staff and resources, on IRCC priorities. It is the prospect of severe disparity that is disconcerting, especially during periods in which routine (not automated) processing gets bogged down for this or that reason, which occasionally happens, which has at times made the routine processing timeline for PR cards exceed six months. Absent an overt issue (such as what triage categorizes as a complex case), it is a problem, a fairness of the procedure issue, if there is a four to six month disparity in the processing timelines for Canadians who equally qualify for a new PR card.
My partner mocks me for saying "
the future is now," but the triteness of touting tautologies aside, it is what it is. Good news, perhaps great news for those on the benefitting side of the equation. Not so great news for many others.