+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
always+ve said:
Yeah aaycee i had vacation travel and short stint of student travel but they were all under 6 months. Secondly i m saying that i sent only the valid passports bcos of the language used in the letter "Valid passports"


Its written nowhere that less than six months of FTH may be ignored... FTH is FTH only doesn't matter time duration I Believe. If there is FTH in older PP it would be included in Valid PPs I guess..
Thats the reason they asked u to submit older ones later on.

AC
 
always+ve said:
Guys pls comeforward and mention anything/requirement that you have received from CHC like how i received requirement for old pp, CB for new passport with laminates, mayankpandya for marriage and so on. It will help us understand y all of us are stuck.

Dear Always +ve
Yes, U are right abt urs as well as CB's case but mayank panday has not even received his MR yet and his BC are going on. So, we cannot include his case in our this discussion.

AC
 
aaycee said:
Dear Always +ve
Yes, U are right abt urs as well as CB's case but mayank panday has not even received his MR yet and his BC are going on. So, we cannot include his case in our this discussion.

AC
I sent my RPRF on 28th march ,encsahed on 4th apr...sm discrepancy in application theory is a possibility...becus i was told abt my pp only after i sent 2-3 inquiry maybe they had too much workload to look at faulty applications.....BUT BUT again so many applicants with similar timelines how come all of us in row committed mistake
CB
 
Placebo said:
Something has been asked by vo who so ever put an enquiry. Its possible that we commited some mistakes
in our applications.As in my wife's background declaration i attached her exp.cert. in teaching currently but
in form i wrote house wife by mistake. So i think this may be the discrepency in my case.

hmm..Its quite possible. I was asked to resubmit my marriage certificate and some photos along with my MR which I did. So possibly our cases have been marked for extra background check.

And being my lucky self, my DD was returned too as there was an error in it. The corrected DD was encashed on the 28th of April.
 
C this is what I am saying. Slightest of error/discrepancy on our part will further delay our process not that we can do anything abt it but just make us understand better.

Anyways I am just making a guess bcos we all are disturbed. I am not surely saying that we have made some mistakes or something is missing so pls don't take offence.

One more thing again this is a theory I spoke to one of the immigration consultant, she says that all applns are on hold as the chc is preparing for new list (groundwork).
 
I may be wrong also but as per my knowledge once VO ask for medical and PP, they check for medical test and security check only. If everything is fine they approve visa and visa is stamped on passports. But if anthing extra is asked along with Medical,RPRF and passports i.e ( Marriage proof, pof , some other extra documents) then definately VO will clear their doubt first through that documents proof. Only then on next BFD they will check further security check and issue visas. The reason is VO issues MR only when they have gone through our documents and background checks thoroughly. If they find any doubt and if it is minor then they issue MR, PP along with proof of that laging document.
If they are not convinced with certain document proof then either they ask for interview or ask separately for only that document proof. Correct me if i am wrong as this is my opinion only.
 
Yesterday I reproduced a quote of some from another forum...he was asked about marriage proof 2.5 months after he submitted the pp. How would this theory be explained then?
 
Hi Nitroxn,

14 questions related to pre marriage marriage & post marriage information.

Like where you first met ? What r the factors consider for marriage ? Venue of marriage & details etc.

Its basics.

Regards
Mayank

nitroxn said:
What were the 14 questions that VO asked. i think i have asked you before.... can you type it all. Just want to check what they need for clarification.
 
always+ve said:
Yesterday I reproduced a quote of some from another forum...he was asked about marriage proof 2.5 months after he submitted the pp. How would this theory be explained then?

Officer would have forgot to ask for marriage proof along with medical/Passport request.(could be human error). And when on BFD the file was opened he/she might have realized that inspite of their marking of marriage proof document, they have not asked applicant to produce it. So they ask for it on his/her BFD. It happens to certain case only as i mentioned human error. Otherwise after MR/PP request the chances of failing are at Medical reports or security check only. Again i m saying this is my thinking only . I may be wrong also.
 
Please friends Cheer up and be positive as chances of failure at this stage is very very less. Even less than 1%. I know waiting has become unbearable but we are going to come out of this phase very soon with god's grace. :) :D
 
Silent said:
Please friends Cheer up and be positive as chances of failure at this stage is very very less. Even less than 1%. I know waiting has become unbearable but we are going to come out of this phase very soon with god's grace. :) :D
True,Stay Positive...my guess first week july is ours.......and the day we get our visa in hand we wouldn't probably remember these days
 
Silent said:
Please friends Cheer up and be positive as chances of failure at this stage is very very less. Even less than 1%. I know waiting has become unbearable but we are going to come out of this phase very soon with god's grace. :) :D

I WISH THE SAME :)
Regarding various hypothesis discussed above, i still go with the Negligence of Visa Office or laziness of Visa Officer theory..

ac
 
aaycee said:
I WISH THE SAME :)
Regarding various hypothesis discussed above, i still go with the Negligence of Visa Office or laziness of Visa Officer theory..

ac

This delay has absolutely nothing to do with additional scrutiny or background checks. There could be one odd case out of 1000 where post PP submission someone is asked for any additional proof like for ex: marriage pics. Pls be mindful of the fact that if passports are damaged they have to be reniewed come what may and that query can come up anytime so it is an exemption.

If you guys see the last line in yr ecas status, it clearly reads - We reviewed your application on _ March and only after that date all of us have received our Medical and PP request. What does that mean? Surely it means that only after reviewing our respctive applications they have processed Med/PP documents for us. So lets stay positive, God is there to see the rest!
 
always+ve said:
Not sure of that but in my opinion the VO's encash the draft almost immediately. "Paisa kaun chodega". Encash it first in case has to be refunded it will be later
i second that ..coz i `ve not undergone medicals (sent for rectification) but rprf DD `s been encashed on 30-04-2011...however they are least bothered to send me rectified medical papers
Monty
 
always+ve said:
Actually no the onus of providing all the documents lies with us. See understand like this if we happen to miss out sending some documents then it is the VO's opinion that may be we are not that serious with our application as we did not fulfill the requirements. U must be aware that the system of sending all the documents to CIO was started for this particular reason that earlier applicants used to not follow up with their applications with the VO's after getting approval and VO's were just made to sit with the files for 120days. So they changed the system. In this again the VO is actually made to sit with our incomplete(presumably) files and so they keep it aside. This is my best guess for the delay. 2 other possibilities are background checks/security clearnce and maybe we are being treated like pre-june but my first explaination sounds more correct bcos we are not dealing with idiots there who would not be able to identify pre-june from post-june. In pre-june my NOC was not even listed.
ur 1st reason sounds correct...my medical papers needed rectification due to a mistake made by my consultant who wrote wrong names of my babies on the backside of photgraphs..... otherwise my case was a speedy one as compared to other mates uptill this mistake
Monty