MissDominica
Champion Member
- May 21, 2012
- 25
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- POS
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- (13-08-2012) 21-08-2014
- Doc's Request.
- ...
- AOR Received.
- (28-11-2012)
- File Transfer...
- (22-10-2012) 10-10-2014
- Med's Request
- ...
- Med's Done....
- (30-05-2012)
- Interview........
- (24-10-2013)
- Passport Req..
- 04-11-2014
- VISA ISSUED...
- 24-11-2014
- LANDED..........
- 05-12-2014
Well, well, well. My ol' friend Dadzin. Wanna get together in POS and have a major bitch-about-POS fest?Dadzin said:Hey Folks,
It's been a while- I have some news...
So our application is now processing 20 months and we didn't hear anything after contacting CIC on numerous occasions. The case notes showed that the officer determined an interview was required July 2012...and 15 months later NO INTERVIEW DATE. I waitied patiently. I contacted my MP September 25, who responded in 2 days! and got a response from POS in about 2 days as well. POS lied and told my MP that the it was July 2013 an interview was determined when the GCMS clearly indicated that July 2012 this was done. I was enraged...my MP said we will just have to wait for the date according to what they sent to the MP. I started writing to the Minister of Cit & Imm when I see 2 emails pop in from POS with interview and docs required!!! Oct 25 is the date! Can you imagine these people though? All this time processing but only when my MP sends a note you lie then quickly give a date. That's because visa offices are not accountable to the people and do as they please when they please.
SO that's some good news guys!!!!! Hang in rest of ya!!!!!
I have a similar situation to Dadzin. After months of hearing nothing from POS and being ignored continuously, while people who applied after me heard news on their application, I decided it was time to get my MP involved. She replied almost immediately and contacted POS the same day. Hours later, I receive an email from POS requesting an interview - October 24. The day before Dadzin. I agree, that if I hadn't gotten my MP involved, POS would have been happy to let my application rot without a thought about me or hubby at all. I was rather pi**ed off to say the least.
There had been nothing in my notes, however, about an interview. My MP told me that the only "little red flag" that the officer she spoke to could see on our file was that "additional proof of co-habitiation is required" since we applied common-law.
I'm a little lost for what else they expect from us, but I spoke to my landlady (at the time we lived together) and she has offered to write a letter on our behalf. With our original application, we included copies of our lease with both of our names on it showing we lived together for over a year, monthly rent receipts in both our names (over a years worth). We did not have any bills or anything because they are included in our rent (which I stated in the application and is clearly stated on our lease itself) and our apartment was furnished (hence no purchasing of items together for the apartment because they were already present). We also submitted a letter from our landlord the first time stating we lived together.
This time we are going to submit a new letter from our landlord with her stating that everything is included in our apartment (hence no bills) and she is going to get it signed by a Justice of Peace to prove its her. Her husband and our neighbour at the time are also going to submit letters that we lived together for that amount of time. I'm not sure what else to provide, given that we submitted TONS of letters and leases/receipts when we applied and they want additional proof.. what else IS there in a situation like this!? We submitted a couple pieces of mail (in each of our names) to the same address, but I didn't get much mail there because I was a student and all my bills went to my address in Canada and there were no bills, etc to arrive at the apartment (as above). So there were only a couple of those.
Anyway, so we've heard as well. Maybe not what we had hoped for, but news none-the-less. Thank goodness for MP's though, because as Dadzin said, these people are not held responsible for anything and who knows how long both of us would have wondered how our application was processing, when clearly it "wasn't" processing AT ALL.
@Zouk, liquor request approved! lol
and I LITERALLY LOL'd at the IV of alcohol. Great minds think alike.
Thank you to everyone who has reached out to me lately.. I've been having a terrible time with all of this. I'm not happy about being called for an interview to provide the same proof again to these people.. but I'm happier to do that and be with hubby sooner instead of waiting and waiting while no one does anything (unless pressured by an MP, of course).