If someone did not apply in 2020 they aren’t part of the same group who has been waiting the longest. There is a large pool of people who have met LICO for years (10+ years) and have applied every year but haven’t been selected. It’s unfortunate that you didn’t apply for PGP in 2020 if you did meet LICO for 2017-2019 but that means that you aren’t part of the group who has applied years and met LICO every year yet never get selected. If people applied correctly you would have at least met LICO since 2017 to qualify to PGP2023 so that does prioritize people that have met LICO since 2017. Going forward there is a very good chance that IRCC will set a certain parameter to try to prioritize people who have been waiting to sponsor their parents versus people who have just qualified for PGP. Given the volume of applicants for PGP and the limited amount of spots people will not be happy unless they get selected r that year. IRCC also doesn’t want to manage a list of applicants that is hundreds of thousands long so they will need to set parameters that will try to give priority to those who have been applying for a while versus those who just arrived. In general Canada needs to clarify that parent sponsorship is mot guaranteed. Canada has an ageing population and our healthcare system can not deal with our current population so adding more seniors (who likely will never pay taxes) isn’t feasible. Most countries do not allow parent sponsorship with access to public healthcare.The assumption that whoever applied in 2020 waited the longest is not right. Maybe some people applied in 2019 and not 2020, and wanted to apply in the subsequent years. They are excluding these people, that is not given the same opportunity as others. The process is not right and fair
Last edited: