Correct Section7.6 explain the delay and several other mysteries.ameet747 said:Hey Guys...I found the following link which might help make clear the logic behind the QA exercise...after clicking the link, scroll down to section 7.6 on page 5 of the pdf file.
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/manuals/op/op07b-eng.pdf
The intention to reside in the nominating province should be reaffirmed in all cases. This is especially important when it is anticipated that a significant time lag may occur between nomination and visa issuance. Officers who have reason to believe that an applicant, whose nomination certificate was issued after September 2, 2008, (all our cases) was nominated on the basis of a passive investment, should proceed to interview the client and/or request additional documentation to satisfy R87(5), (6) and (9) requirements. Most of us will not fall in the R87(5), (6) and (9) ?
Hence the phone calls.
There has been some inaccurate coding of provincial nominees that has had a negative impact on our ability to assess the success of the program. The two most frequent problems are as follows:
While provinces have different reasons for nominating individuals (some because of occupational skills they possess, some because of their business acumen, some because of their willingness to settle in under-populated regions), all provincial nominees are to be considered members of the provincial nominee class for federal coding purposes. Some officers have in the past erroneously coded provincial nominees with business skills as entrepreneurs or self-employed, for example. The immigration category in CAIPS must be PV2 for all applicants who are being selected at a visa office on the basis of a certificate of nomination by a province.
Hence PV2
The nominating province should always be accurately coded and this coding must remain unchanged throughout the landing process. There have been many cases where provincial nominees nominated by one province indicate upon landing that they are destined to another province, and Canada Border Services Agency officers have taken it upon themselves to change the province of destination on the file. It has been found that in most of these cases, the new permanent resident is simply visiting friends or family on their way to their new home, and most do end up reporting to and settling in the province that nominated them.
Hence Destination ONTARIO
It still does not answer why 4+ months after the medical received and when the QA will end.