Just for the curiosity of things, i can count 5 wrong things just in your opening message to the forumEagle333 said:Take time and outline 5 wrong things that I said to members of this forum and please correct me. I am glad to learn if you show me. You're free to help people since you sound like you're experienced too than seating there and lashing at me. People need help and not what you're doing now. What you are doing is called distraction.
Isashali78 has officially took over this thread, going forward Eagle333 will not take questions and all questions will be addressed to him or her.
I'd like to see how you handle questions.
1. WRONG: "After 3 months an officer will open your file again and begin to do some work, your ecas still showing APPLICTION RECEIVED".
CORRECT: The actual amount of time after which file will be opened and assessed for eligibility can be anywhere from 0 months to 2 years, depending on the visa office and backlog in that office. For example Paris vs London (non-UK applicants)
2. WRONG: "At this point when Ecas displayed Medical results have been received which was the 3rd line, any applicants used to know that their application were almost done."
CORRECT: For sponsorship applications, for MOST applications the medicals are being done upfront and therefore for MOST people the line about medicals was present all the time. In any case, appearance of this line means absolutely nothing.
3. WRONG: "Back then Decision made without re- medical, Medical request or PPR was a sign of rejection and a good number of people used to know that their applications were rejected until they received their decision made letters to be double sure"
CORRECT: That was never the case for sponsorship applications. It was the case for economic class applications though.
4. WRONG: "The NEW IN PROCESS has replaced the old status called APPLICATION RECEIEVED if it says: ...
This way you are not off of the interview's hook yet, they just update your Ecas with those 2 lines they will only show the date they started processing your file when Eligibility passes and background checks have then begun"
CORRECT: The new in process meaning that your file have been received in the VO, the case officer went over the file, checked it for completeness and usually will request any additional or missing documents. No processing or eligibility review has been started
5. WRONG: "You will mostly likely see the third line after months and months when your file has matured for PPR and ready for a decision."
CORRECT: For some VO, the eligibility review happens within a month or two, for example Paris, Sao Paolo, Singapore in certain cases. For other PPR happens almost immediately while decision will not be made for months to come (Manila for example)
It was harmless so nobody, including myself, corrected you, but you are going too far "deciding" people's status, timelines and what they should do and when and I ,personally, thought that you should be stopped. I am not going to go over all your replies, but some of them are just screaming "WTF?!" , for example where you promise someone that they will get PPR or DM within 1-4 weeks. Unless you are their case officer or new immigration minister how in the world would you know and be that certain?!
Regarding "your space" and "your thread", do people a favor and let them ask their question on the main sponsorship forum pages and in specific VO threads, there are many experienced and extremely knowledgeable people on this forum who will try to answer every question on topics they KNOW about. Its not about your ego or you saving the world - you are not helping anyone providing wrong answers and false hopes.