Thanks!byrwus said:just tried to emphasise that you answer people very fast.
So I usually see what's going on.
Thanks!byrwus said:just tried to emphasise that you answer people very fast.
You only have 4 posts. AFAIK you need at least 10 posts to unlock that feature.Rick277 said:I don't see forum profile information icon/tab
Sorry to say that, but you can't assume to be 100% eligible for PR. There were applicants on this forum before with the same employer, doing the same job, having the same job letter and one was approved and anotherone refused. All depends on the VO. Fingers crossed.Rick277 said:a co-worker applied to PR under the same NOC category as me.He got his PR. my job letter is 95% same as him. I have 100% content of his letter and additional points too. Can i assume that my job letter is 100% eligible to get PR and wouldn't be anywhere in making my application weaker?
There's no shitty reasons to get refusedTeddyXYZ said:Yeah I know what you mean nov1061 I just hope that they won't refuse my application just because of sh***y reason =D
I agree, but again, it's a pass/system. That is, if your documents ( incl. the reference letter ) contain all the informationTeddyXYZ said:Well when you read all that stories that they refused someone just because they didn't like the letter of employment and were too "lazy" to ask for additional information =D that can freak you out
Why would that look that?? As long as all jobs were legit and you worked with proper authorization, thebyrwus said:guys,
a question especially to those who are already on the brighter side of life:
in the past years I had an employment with world class company for about 3.5 years.
But also I had like 5 places where I worked less than a year. (you know, as a young graduate I had to accept any job there was and I jumped to a new one as soon as I found it). I know it looks bad from the perspective of Human Resources.
Do you think it may be a reason for refusal?????