The challenge is that CIC distinguishes between study and work permit and technically, students have their primary responsibility as study. So, I think that is why they dont count work done while studying. But if you are working as a TA/RA, and you are enrolled in a university, it may be difficult to claim you were not studying full time because International students are expevted to be studying full time all through the year (except in Spring/Summer for some schools). And as for the definition of full or part time study, I think that is defined by the institutions. So, even if you are in class only 1hr a week, and your and your school considers that as full time, then its full time.YehiaZ said:I think we need to know the definition of the full time student. Does a full time student only take courses ? for example, if I am a PhD student for three years and I took all the courses in the first year (i.e. if this definition is correct , then it means the later two years I am working as RA and TA without taking any courses). Additionally, in this case, I should claim the RA experience and I should not mark the "were you studying full-time during the job" checkbox and you will be eligible for CEC or FSW. The other definition is: you are a full time student as long as you are working as RA and/or TA and did not been graduated yet. Then, in this case you can claiming RA or TA will not provide any points. I am really confused between the two definitions.
This is my take on the whole issue, its based on my engagement with the issue and I cannot quote any sources. Its just logic and reasoning. I may be wrong and I honestly hope I am wrong. I wish TA/RA positions give some points.