YehiaZ said:I think we need to know the definition of the full time student. Does a full time student only take courses ? for example, if I am a PhD student for three years and I took all the courses in the first year (i.e. if this definition is correct , then it means the later two years I am working as RA and TA without taking any courses). Additionally, in this case, I should claim the RA experience and I should not mark the "were you studying full-time during the job" checkbox and you will be eligible for CEC or FSW. The other definition is: you are a full time student as long as you are working as RA and/or TA and did not been graduated yet. Then, in this case you can claiming RA or TA will not provide any points. I am really confused between the two definitions.
The challenge is that CIC distinguishes between study and work permit and technically, students have their primary responsibility as study. So, I think that is why they dont count work done while studying. But if you are working as a TA/RA, and you are enrolled in a university, it may be difficult to claim you were not studying full time because International students are expevted to be studying full time all through the year (except in Spring/Summer for some schools). And as for the definition of full or part time study, I think that is defined by the institutions. So, even if you are in class only 1hr a week, and your and your school considers that as full time, then its full time.
This is my take on the whole issue, its based on my engagement with the issue and I cannot quote any sources. Its just logic and reasoning. I may be wrong and I honestly hope I am wrong. I wish TA/RA positions give some points.