Right said:
Seglad,
Yes you are right but the statement is as at 1994...I insist.
As we write now, the OPS6 has been amended. They amend their provisions periodically. moreso when they really want to reduce the backlog and even reduce the numbers of the incoming immigrants.
Right,
THOUGH, the pasted link was for 1994. The statement i mentioned earlier still valid for the UPDATED OP6 2010. The evident is cleared, when CHC writes applicants to submit a request within period of either,(45,60,90,120) days, they always mention in the request letter that'' If we have not received a response from you WITHIN (45,60,90,120 )DAYS of the date of this letter, your application will be assessed based on the information available on file, which may result in a refusal of your application''. Here comes the interpretation, if one receive a request from CHC and cannot meet up within the days given, one can advise, write/respond to the letter of one's inability to meet up with the deadline, if there are/would be any hinderances to meet up with the request, to hold the disposition of the case in abeyance for a period of time pending efforts by the you to comply with the statutory requirment.
@ Right, if you check my timeframe, i was to submit my medical report in 60 days from march. I wrote to CHC before the 60days to explain the hinderances surrounding my case and inability to be able to meet up with the 60days deadline, since CHC received such response, then, they put my file back on a queeue, until my medical was submitted in July, two and a half months after my 60days. I wrote CHC in October, they confirm that my application is on a queeue awaiting final decission. ''Experience is the best teacher'' they say, if anyone is being asked to sub mit a request and one cannot meet up, it is better to advise the CHC rather than keeping mute, or submit late.