Good pointjubear said:Tosinosho1992,
There is one thing I have learnt about CIC. They are unpredictable/inconsistent and can protect themselves when it suits them. If you've been following this forum for the past 9 months, I'm pretty sure by now you know that thousands of graduates couldn't work because of the vague implied status definition/incentives that so many employers doubted and questioned. A lot of applicants lost jobs they had held at the time, lost job offers after interviews, got frustrated, stressed and disappointed by CIC.
Imagine a situation where you apply for PR, wait for 16 months or less and get rejected just because you didn't fulfill the 1 year work experience requirement at the time of application. Then you get frustrated, stressed, spend more and perhaps apply for restoration. Its not a good experience for anyone. I know quite a few PR applicants who faced those problems.
To be on a safe side, the Rule of Thumb is to: Count the duration of your work experience gained after you received your PGWP. Most PGWP holders who faced these challenges, including those who are still waiting wouldn't want to naively face the same obstacles and stressful experiences. Personally I think that it is better to take the necessary precautions, no rush, get that work experience required with a WP and a job within the expected NOC codes. That way you clear any doubt on your side as an applicant and that of the processing agents.
Cheers!
NDUFB11,NDUFB11 said:Hi Jubear,
As far as you know is there anybody who applied with a lawyer and have been waiting for more then 4 months to get the work permit?
do you think it would make the difference?
thanks
I had similar experience when I applied for PR under the PhD student category. They rejected my application after one year of applying stating I have only 65 points. I would have saved $550 and 1 year if they had rejected my application after checking the eligibility when I submittedjubear said:Imagine a situation where you apply for PR, wait for 16 months or less and get rejected just because you didn't fulfill the 1 year work experience requirement at the time of application. Then you get frustrated, stressed, spend more and perhaps apply for restoration. Its not a good experience for anyone. I know quite a few PR applicants who faced those problems.
Cheers!
They can be cruel that way. I think that Jubear's wise words and you sharing your experience further cements the importance of taking precaution. As future applicants we will learn from this. I hope that you applied again though. All the best man.mumbaikar said:I had similar experience when I applied for PR under the PhD student category. They rejected my application after one year of applying stating I have only 65 points. I would have saved $550 and 1 year if they had rejected my application after checking the eligibility when I submitted
Hello,nizolas said:Just fyi,
Applied: May 13th
Approved on: Nov 9th
Mail delivery: still waiting (219 days)
Called them today and told them that Monday 21st will be six that my work permit is granted and they said i still need to wait for Monday to ask for a re-print. He can put the request for a re-print in the system yet because it's not 6 weeks yet and I can still receive the work permit from Canada post during the weekend.
Hi, congrats. was aug 29 the day you mailed it or the day cic received it? thanks for sharingwinnipeg141 said:I just received work permit today Sent paper application around Aug 29.
I mailed it on Aug 29, and it probably took a week to delivered as it was regular post.ujont said:Hi, congrats. was aug 29 the day you mailed it or the day cic received it? thanks for sharing
Congrats man.tosinosho1992 said:Hi Guys,
My application finally got approved today. Application date: August 14th. Thanks and good luck to everyone waiting.