They would land virtually all in land applicants regardless where they are. I did not inform I was away.
This is wrong. In fact they do specifically ask for a proof you are in Canada, or a declaration at least as far as I understand. (Depending on when you did it can be one or the other - as far as Ican tell.)
Here's the
official website explaining the portal:
"How the portal works
Once we approve your application we will send you an invitation
to confirm
- your email address
- all email addresses for each person on your application
- you’re in Canada"
And here's a post as far back as July 2020, showing that they want you to be in Canada to land virtually.
I got an email mentioning to complete virtual landing they wanted to know if I was still in Canada and my address and the date and last point of entry into Canada.
Anyways, that's not the point of this thread. But I just wanted to clarify that this is another thing that
might be causing some of the issues of sponsor approval.
Your sponsorship application, with
three
TRV refusals for your spouse, and being sent when you did not meet the
requirements of sponsorship (not physically here, and borderline not a PR either - virtual landing while outside too - at the time of sending it) are all good reasons for scrutiny and delays on IRCC's side. You even want to now apply for a business TRV or other PR streams? (I don't think you can have multiple PR applications anyway)
How to proceed is your call, but these are the facts as I see them. It doesn't seem like your chances of TRV approval are high. Focus on getting your sponsorship application in order.
Note: if you withdraw your application and send a new one, by that point you will have 3 TRV refusals, and 7 months of a sponsorship application that was withdrawn. All the more reasons for scrutiny, I think. So if you end up going down the withdrawal road, I'd highly suggest sending a strong explanatory letter justifying why all of these things exist in your file history. But you might be able to achieve the same results by sending the explanatory letter and
without withdrawing.
Maybe you should even consult an expert at this point?
Edits: formatting