+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
aarfie said:
Insha ALLAH i am also going to apply for CAIPs.
but currently i am unable to download the form
from the location given below...
1. Download the form here: http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/kits/forms/IMM5563B.pdf

aarfie
Ohhh there was my personal computer problem... :P
and i have got the file from my server.
but still there was a problem while opening the file. >:(
i think its corrupt.
aarfie.
 
aarfie said:
Insha ALLAH i am also going to apply for CAIPs.
but currently i am unable to download the form
from the location given below...
1. Download the form here: http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/kits/forms/IMM5563B.pdf

aarfie


this is correct and updated form

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/kits/forms/IMM5563E.pdf
 
Ur SELDEC is 'waived' [code-4]

umahmed said:
Hi
Iwant to ask about SELDEC =4
What does it means
thank you 4 helping
 
Yes its good to apply now as per current processing trend of CHC

aarfie said:
But dear cheeta37.
i m still RBVO.
should i go this?
my timeline is
Muhammad Ahmad
Pakistan
0213: IT Professional
Exp: 10 years
IELTs: 6.0
Applied to NS:17-Jun-2010.
Recieved to NS Via DHL:21-Jun-2010;
AOR Accepted Documents requrested:21-oct-2010
Documents sent to London Visa Office:09-Feb-2011
Documents Received to London Visa Office via DHL:11-Feb-2011
Letter Received from London Visa Office Via courier:06-Jul-2011.
and e-status is "VO have received your file and Pending for review".
what do u think after reading my timeline...
should i go for CAIPs.
aarfie
 
yar mujhay bhi to reply do :(
 
Following is the Case History of my application.



Applied: 4-06-2009

Received in Sedny: 11-06-2009

DD Encashed: 12-07-2009

AOR: 05-08-2009

Doc Sent: 26-10-2009

Online Status Changed to "Received by Visa Office": 23-11-2009

2nd AOR: 2-12-2009

File transfer to London: 30-06-2010

Updated Documents including Fee to add Spouse sent: 26-01-2012

DD Encashed: 16-02-2012

CAIPS Applied 2nd time: 23-02-2012

My Two contact numbers are mentioned on e-case status one mobile number and 2nd Landline number. My Landline number is written incorrect on e-case status and also on AOR envelop received from CHC, i also submitted more then 3 emails and also letters to CHC for the correction of Landline number but its still incorrect,But when My first CAIPS issued on 4th April 2010 in CAIPS file it was written correct.

please suggest should i again send case specific inquiry for rectification of Landline number and asking the current developments in my case as allot of applicants of my timelines got response from CHC or should i wait?

i am still having status In Process with RBVO inside.

Cheeta
 
"Selections Decision"
umahmed said:
thank you sir
Ok it is waived but seldec what does it mean?
 
cheeta37 said:
Following is the Case History of my application.



Applied: 4-06-2009

Received in Sedny: 11-06-2009

DD Encashed: 12-07-2009

AOR: 05-08-2009

Doc Sent: 26-10-2009

Online Status Changed to "Received by Visa Office": 23-11-2009

2nd AOR: 2-12-2009

File transfer to London: 30-06-2010

Updated Documents including Fee to add Spouse sent: 26-01-2012

DD Encashed: 16-02-2012

CAIPS Applied 2nd time: 23-02-2012

My Two contact numbers are mentioned on e-case status one mobile number and 2nd Landline number. My Landline number is written incorrect on e-case status and also on AOR envelop received from CHC, i also submitted more then 3 emails and also letters to CHC for the correction of Landline number but its still incorrect,But when My first CAIPS issued on 4th April 2010 in CAIPS file it was written correct.

please suggest should i again send case specific inquiry for rectification of Landline number and asking the current developments in my case as allot of applicants of my timelines got response from CHC or should i wait?

i am still having status In Process with RBVO inside.

Cheeta

You have already notified them many times no need to do it again as long as your mobile number is correct as i assume tcs will call on your mobile if not been able to get you on your landline number.

Cheers
Saki
 
cheeta37 said:
Following is the Case History of my application.



Applied: 4-06-2009

Received in Sedny: 11-06-2009

DD Encashed: 12-07-2009

AOR: 05-08-2009

Doc Sent: 26-10-2009

Online Status Changed to "Received by Visa Office": 23-11-2009

2nd AOR: 2-12-2009

File transfer to London: 30-06-2010

Updated Documents including Fee to add Spouse sent: 26-01-2012

DD Encashed: 16-02-2012

CAIPS Applied 2nd time: 23-02-2012

My Two contact numbers are mentioned on e-case status one mobile number and 2nd Landline number. My Landline number is written incorrect on e-case status and also on AOR envelop received from CHC, i also submitted more then 3 emails and also letters to CHC for the correction of Landline number but its still incorrect,But when My first CAIPS issued on 4th April 2010 in CAIPS file it was written correct.

please suggest should i again send case specific inquiry for rectification of Landline number and asking the current developments in my case as allot of applicants of my timelines got response from CHC or should i wait?

i am still having status In Process with RBVO inside.

Cheeta
Dear Cheeta37,
according to my opinion u must not send inquiries again and again.
as they had said it will effect ur timeline.
Although while getting ur CAIPs, u r well aware that the land line number is correct then u must not worried about it.
because some time online activity is far behind the real picture happening around them.
aarfie
 
umahmed said:
thank you very much
I am soryIcan not catch it.selection decision does it refer to interview , medical or any thing alse?

dear umahmed,
please check this link.
i hope this will help u.

http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/anyone-having-seldec-4-in-caips-notes-t75758.0.html

it should mean that sel dec is not required for your case, which is a good thing.

http://immigrationguides.com/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=203


aarfie
 
Dear all whom a rejection letter your ecase has a processing date or only the detail of RBVO only.
sorry if I sound like drowning man hanging by a straw.
Regards