That's fine.Ah yes, that could be an issue. I'm sorry that this happened to you.
We just want to be treated fair.
I will consult my lawyer next week.
I heard there has voice record.
As an officer, you cannot review the case by your own preference.
That's fine.Ah yes, that could be an issue. I'm sorry that this happened to you.
IRCC only regularly records the audio of hearings, not of interviews. I cannot find a single appeal decision of the IAD that references audio recordings of an interview - they are almost exclusively referring to audio recordings of hearings.That's fine.
We just want to be treated fair.
I will consult my lawyer next week.
I heard there has voice record.
As an officer, you cannot review the case by your own preference.
Was the interview conducted in your spouse's native language or in English? Was a translator there? Could that be a lost in translation case?We are same sex relationship. And both of us are Chinese.
What about your relationship would give them grounds to think it is false?
But the truth is she didn't ask the these questions but put it on the note.Have a look at the OPs posting history. Loads of reasons why IRCC would see this as a marriage of convienience. I have my doubts that IRCC would document questions and answers that weren’t actually asked, particularly given the background of the applicants.
I with my spouse. But she asked me some basic question and let me wait outside.Were you at the interview?
I also looked at an old post by OP and I am very confused with the timeline.Oh goodness your case is complicated. You had a husband, you separated, you decided you still had feelings. He's overstayed 10 years. Was refused H&C. You were legally separated, and landed without him on your COPR. The spouse is not a member of the family class as you were separated at the time but they were not examined. Your spouse also lied on a personal history form. You were only married for one month before separation - and then you moved in with a female roommate. While the initial visa officer had no concerns, I imagine the current visa officer would have plenty.
If you are appealing, you need to be absolutely certain none of these questions were asked because the IAD is going to assume that they were.
Share the notes when you have a chance.
I disclose him in my PR application. He was ready for the examination from CIC. But CIC didn't ask for the examination.Oh goodness your case is complicated. You had a husband, you separated, you decided you still had feelings. He's overstayed 10 years. Was refused H&C. You were legally separated, and landed without him on your COPR. The spouse is not a member of the family class as you were separated at the time but they were not examined. Your spouse also lied on a personal history form. You were only married for one month before separation - and then you moved in with a female roommate. While the initial visa officer had no concerns, I imagine the current visa officer would have plenty.
If you are appealing, you need to be absolutely certain none of these questions were asked because the IAD is going to assume that they were.
Share the notes when you have a chance.
I also looked at an old post by OP and I am very confused with the timeline.
Sponsor landed in 2017 after he and PA got married and legally separated in 2016?
Then again apply to sponsor PA in 2018.
And did sponsor and PA ever lived together after their marriage?
btw meeting parents as "best friends" is very different from meeting as a spouse.
How about the relationship with that female roommate? This is a complicated case....
As I know some other same sex application which get approval. The parents don't even know the spouse at all.I also looked at an old post by OP and I am very confused with the timeline.
Sponsor landed in 2017 after he and PA got married and legally separated in 2016?
Then again apply to sponsor PA in 2018.
And did sponsor and PA ever lived together after their marriage?
btw meeting parents as "best friends" is very different from meeting as a spouse.
How about the relationship with that female roommate? This is a complicated case....
I signed up because I had a similar experience as you have stated. My spouse also had an interview and got refused. I read through the interview notes and I was surprised the officer wrote so many things he didn’t ask and my spouse didn’t say.Hello Everyone:
My spouse had the interview on April and it was refused. As sponsor, I have already submitted the appeal.
I have received the GCMS note yesterday and found that at least half of the note was not truth.
For example, the officer wrote that she asked my spouse that whether he know my previous job, earning, address in Canada. My spouse answered "Sorry, I only have little info about it." My spouse said she never aked questions about my background.
Furthermore, she wrote she asked what was our plan after moving to Canada. And my spouse answered we didn't talk about that. So ridiculous.
At the end of the note she said she was not satisfied because my spouse had great difficulty to tell my background, limited knowledge about my family and etc.
Even in the interview, my spouse mentioned two times that if you have any concerns with our relationship and these evidence cannot satisfied you, you can ask me any detailed question about our relationship. She never asked.
I am so frustrated. Because you asked us to be honest and truthful during the application, but your officer cannot even write what exactly happened in the interview?
So in the appeal can we apply to get the voice or video record?
Thanks everyone.
I still can not believe that the office will lie on the note.
I know most of you cannot believe. But the thing is actually happening right now.
