Yeah, that's always a though one. But I would say, if someone has a written statement that he/she personally allowed to work under implied status, I would say, go for it. But it's better to get this statement through the MP than the regular call centre agents.Ponga said:If CIC receives the second OWP application by August 8th, it might work. Now comes the $64k question...does the person stop working until they receive the OWP? Remember how many arguments there have been here about PGWP and OWP?
As for insonoro's case, it's surprising that they said he/she (sorry, I'm not sure) is allowed to work. As a rule of thumb I got that you are good to go with PGWP but not with IEC. But one thing is clear:
If you leave, your implied status as a worker is over.If you leave Canada while under implied status, you may be authorized to re-enter Canada:
(...)
As a worker or student, if the officer determines that your application to extend your work/study permit was approved while you were outside Canada
Also, from an older source:
I'm sorry to say, but CBSA officer not always so well informed about CIC's rules and process.Re-enter Canada as a TR, if the Case Processing Centre (CPC) has not yet made a decision on your application to extend your work permit. Please note that you will not be permitted to work/study until you receive your new permit. You must satisfy the officer at the port of entry (POE) that you have sufficient means of support. This applies if you:
- are temporary resident visa (TRV) exempt;
- held a valid multiple-entry visa before leaving Canada; or
- travelled only to the United States** and/or St. Pierre and Miquelon by the end of the period initially authorized for their stay or any extension to it