screech339
VIP Member
- Apr 2, 2013
- 552
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Vegreville
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 14-08-2012
- AOR Received.
- 20-11-2012
- Med's Done....
- 18-07-2012
- Interview........
- 17-06-2013
- LANDED..........
- 17-06-2013
Even though the BO must have a good reason to deny the applicant back, one good reason the agent can say is this: "the applicant did not comply with the rules of the inland sponsorship. If the applicant wanted to leave without repercussion to the application, the outland application suits this problem. There is a reason why we give applicants 2 choices. Otherwise the inland application is no different from outland process. We can do away with the inland process and only offer outland applications only".computergeek said:Note that if refused at the border, the officer really would need to have some sort of "good reason" to do so, as its impact on you is rather harsh. Note that a refusal at the border can be challenged in Federal Court and while I have only seen a handful of such challenges, I suspect the Court would be inclined to hear such a challenge if the officer didn't have good reason for a refusal, especially given the impact it would have on an applicant.
With that said, I've never heard anyone here directly report such a refusal and plenty of people report success. So yes, there is a risk. But it doesn't seem like a high risk. Some people's ability to handle risk is lower than others. That's why some people can never leave their house (even though statistically speaking home is a rather dangerous place).
Screech339