Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos, while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Confining animals to zoos is considered inaccurate by few people, however, for others zoological gardens ought to be important for providing entertainment and easy access to natural beasts and birds. In my opinion, I certainly believe that zoos provide opportunities to mankind to view animals at ease and are important for environment.
On the one hand, these animal housing facilities provide easy access to human being, as well as, an opportunity for recreational activities and I completely agree. Firstly, kids can watch their favorite animals with naked eye which allows them to have a real feel of what they see on TV screens or in published books. Subsequent point is that zoos present animals from each and every of the world in one place. People cannot travel around the planet to natural fields in search of every species. Take, Giraffes, for example - which are only available in the middle and southern part of Africa, if there had been no zoos then children of European or any other content would have never seen them in actual. Consequently, it becomes almost infeasible to see different animals all of our lives.
On the contrary, people who oppose zoos often consider keeping animals in confined spaces as inhumane. For them, each species shall be kept in their natural habitat just like human beings so that they can enjoy their lives same like us. Secondly, such group of individuals think that keeping animals in confined spaces mars their natural abilities. This sort of forceful abduction results in changing animals’ habits, food requirements and certain other aspects.
Therefore, it seems reasonable to conclude that zoos are needful for mankind, as they provide entertainment and scenic opportunities; however, animals ought to be taken well care off depending upon their requirements.