BrianDell
Star Member
- Jan 3, 2014
- 7
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Beijing
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 17 Oct 2014
- AOR Received.
- 1 Jan 2015
- File Transfer...
- 6 Jan 2015<br>IP 3 June 2015
- Med's Done....
- 9 Jan 2015
- Passport Req..
- 17 June 2015
- VISA ISSUED...
- 1 Aug 2015 (delivered)
- LANDED..........
- 11 Aug 2015 in Edmonton
"In February 2015, received an email that file was transferred to Hong Kong Visa Office."
Every other mainland applicant I've heard about had their files transferred to HK on March 25. You're sure about February?
"On July 2, 2015 received an email from Hong Kong Visa Office requesting passport.
Sent passport in on July 7, 2015. CIC received passport on July 8, 2015.
Received passport back with COPR letter on July 15, 2015."
Thanks for the timeline suntzubinfa, and congratulations, but can you comment on when e-CAS indicated "Decision Made"? Was the passport sent to the Beijing VAC (Visa Application Centre)?
My wife's passport was sent in a week before yours but has yet to be sent back. I contacted the Beijing VAC by email yesterday and got the following form letter within just an hour or two:
"After tracking, your application is still under processing at the Canadian Embassy. Normally, the processing time of EAPP immigration visa application will be taken [sic] about 4 weeks, but the exactly [sic] processing time is decided solely by the Canadian Embassy."
EAPP generally refers to Electronically APPlied for temporary resident visas, but here I see the term used to preface "immigration visa". I note that the VAC language is not standard CIC language. For example, the VAC (run by VFS Global) refers to the "Canada visa office" in its communications.
What I suspect happened in our case is that having decision made so quickly after going in progress (just two weeks) ironically delayed us because had the passport arrived before decision made, the case would have been closed out with a visa issuance at the same time as decision made. But because the passport was missing, we got a bring forward date (BFD) to 30 days from passport request and if the passport arrives earlier than 30 days, it'll just sit and wait until the bring forward date anyway because the "decision made" took the file off the visa officer's active files list (or something like that). One would think that a clerk could just stick the counterfoil in the passport without having to re-engage the attention of the assigned officer but I suppose the same officer who worked the file has to check the passport's stamps against the applicant's claimed travel history, which in our case was relatively extensive (travel to Korea, Mexico, multiple trips to the US). If that's the case, our BFD is tomorrow so the visa officer should be alerted to pull out her file, notice that the mail room has added the passport to it, and close it out.
Every other mainland applicant I've heard about had their files transferred to HK on March 25. You're sure about February?
"On July 2, 2015 received an email from Hong Kong Visa Office requesting passport.
Sent passport in on July 7, 2015. CIC received passport on July 8, 2015.
Received passport back with COPR letter on July 15, 2015."
Thanks for the timeline suntzubinfa, and congratulations, but can you comment on when e-CAS indicated "Decision Made"? Was the passport sent to the Beijing VAC (Visa Application Centre)?
My wife's passport was sent in a week before yours but has yet to be sent back. I contacted the Beijing VAC by email yesterday and got the following form letter within just an hour or two:
"After tracking, your application is still under processing at the Canadian Embassy. Normally, the processing time of EAPP immigration visa application will be taken [sic] about 4 weeks, but the exactly [sic] processing time is decided solely by the Canadian Embassy."
EAPP generally refers to Electronically APPlied for temporary resident visas, but here I see the term used to preface "immigration visa". I note that the VAC language is not standard CIC language. For example, the VAC (run by VFS Global) refers to the "Canada visa office" in its communications.
What I suspect happened in our case is that having decision made so quickly after going in progress (just two weeks) ironically delayed us because had the passport arrived before decision made, the case would have been closed out with a visa issuance at the same time as decision made. But because the passport was missing, we got a bring forward date (BFD) to 30 days from passport request and if the passport arrives earlier than 30 days, it'll just sit and wait until the bring forward date anyway because the "decision made" took the file off the visa officer's active files list (or something like that). One would think that a clerk could just stick the counterfoil in the passport without having to re-engage the attention of the assigned officer but I suppose the same officer who worked the file has to check the passport's stamps against the applicant's claimed travel history, which in our case was relatively extensive (travel to Korea, Mexico, multiple trips to the US). If that's the case, our BFD is tomorrow so the visa officer should be alerted to pull out her file, notice that the mail room has added the passport to it, and close it out.