Hello everyone,
I just got my GCMS notes (151 pages) and would love to get your opinion. Here is some basic information:
AOR 16th of May
bg in progress since the end of May
Assessments
Eligibility: Recommend Passed
Security: not started
Criminality: in progress
Medical: Passed
Review type:
Support Service Agent APPLICATION:Exxxxx REGULATION:CEC I have reviewed this application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file and note the following. EXPRESS ENTRY - APPLICATION SENT FOR R10 REVIEW min Score:470 - ITA Score:498. PRINCIPAL APPLICANT APPLICATION PROMOTED: New UCI Created REVIEW NOTES FOR REPRESENTATIVE: NO Representation MEDICAL ATTACHED TO UCI: Yes RCMP Check Initiated CLIENT FEES: Paid PROOF OF EDUCATION PROVIDED: Yes LANGUAGES: Principal Applicant - English: IELTS - Received: Met Threshold and Verified Documents Set for Review: Client Information Education documents Funds, proof Police certificates
***AGENT REVIEW EDUCATION***EDUCATION DOCUMENTS ECA report verified on issuing agency website; foreign credential confirmed on ECA site. ECA Canadian Equivalency Summary reported by issuing agency as DIPLOMA AND BACHELOR'S DEGREE. Credential is consistent with level of education claimed by PA under EE Eligibility.
***AGENT REVIEW*** R10 POLICE CERTIFICATES R-10 OK Letter of explanation regarding UNITED STATES FBI police certificate on application. Refer to eDoc xxxxx. All other required police certificates on application; following PC's NRT CZECH REPUBLIC, AUSTRALIA, RCMP. Criminality Decision Pending until outstanding PC from United States FBI received. AGE Applicant's age reviewed and no change from ITA to e-APR.
REVIEW TYPE: Case Analyst APPLICATION: Exxxxxxxx REGULATION: CEC Having analyzed this application based on the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file, I make the following recommendation. ____________________________ I have verified this application under Section 11.2 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) and make the following determination. EXPRESS ENTRY: "Education"128 Client Highest Level of Education - Verified "Work Experience"040 - CRS Canadian Work Duration - Verified "Adaptability"094 - Client Age - Verified "Language" 136 - First Official Language - Verified "Skill Transferability" 050 - Education - Verified 050 - Foreign Work Experience - Verified Total Evaluated CRS: 498 MIN CRS REQUIRED: 470 ***Requirements of A11.2: APPEARS TO MEET***_____________________________ FOSS/GCMS:-No adverse info. All applicants do not hold valid status in Canada _____________
CIVIL STATUS: PA (U. Klara) - Single - Copy of passport: On File __________
MEC/R87.1: QUALIFYING PERIOD (QP): from 16MAY2013 to 15MAY2016 - Authorized NOC 0,A,B work experience within QP: 08JUL2012 to 07JUL2013 AND 28APR2014 TO 27APR2015 - Category of work permit: PGWP - Post-secondary studies in Canada: None WORK EXPERIENCE 1: - WORK PERIOD:AUG2012 to JUN2013(full time) - WORK TITLE/NOC: Shift Supervisor (NOC 6310) - EMPLOYER: Starbucks - LOE DATE: 28MAR2016 - LOE: confirms dates of employment, position title, salary of XXX per hour APPLICABLE POSITIVE CONDITIONS: - Web-based search conducted - Employer information verified **Lead Statement and Main Duties appear to be met** Additional Notes: www.starbucks.ca ___________________WORK EXPERIENCE 2: WORK PERIOD:MAY2014 to APR2015 (full time) - WORK TITLE/NOC: Shift Supervisor (NOC:6310) - EMPLOYER: Starbucks - LOE DATE: 28MAR2016 - LOE: confirms dates of employment, position title, salary of xxxx per hour APPLICABLE POSITIVE CONDITIONS: - web-based search conducted - Employer information verified**Lead Statement and Main Duties appear to be met**Additional Notes: - starbucks.ca ***MEC/R87.1: Appears MET***_______________________
CRIMINALITY: PA: - RCMP Screening: No reportable trace _______________
MEDICALS: - Valid Results in GCMS for ALL APPLICANTS ________________
RECOMMEDATION: Appears to meet A11.2&R87.1 requirements Additional Notes: - PA have representative - PA answer :"YES" to VR in statutory questions
Thank you for your feedback