The notes seem OK to me, only things is kinda question mark... Why has your medical not started... Was it a typo from your side?
Is this a family sponsorship application?
GCMS NOTES WELL EXPLAINED HAS NEVER BEFORE UNTIL NOW
- Thread starter Eagle333
- Start date
Is this a family sponsorship application?
The only thing I can pick out from the notes is that the agent is pointing out that he need the case officer to review the PoF documents that you submitted.Also, allow me to re-post this here... the previous thread I was following seems to be dead. This is what I got for my GCMS notes... ANY THOUGHTS?
A11.2 - CASE PROCESSING AGENT: Lock-in Date: 2018-05-26 PA: ___ Rhezie - EE FSW Having analyzed this application based on the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file, I make the following recommendation.
------------------------------------
Ml3 A11.2: REVIEW REQUIRED R75: FSW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS - REVIEW REQUIRED R76: SELECTION CRITERIA - FSW POINTS : APPEARS TO MEET R76: SELECTION CRITERIA - FUNDS : REVIEW REQUIRED FSW points total: 69 Ready to Finalize RPRF: Complete
Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) CRS Score at invitation to apply (ITA ) 486 CRS points minimum score for round: 444 CRS score at application (APR): 486 Total CRS Points Assessed: 461 I have reviewed the following for CRS points: PA gained points as SINGLE at ITA and A PR PA gained points for 2 year(s) Foreign Work Experience with ____ & _____ PA gained points for Canadian Education Transcript Provided Diploma ____Provided
INTEGRATED SEARCH (FOSS/GCMS): PA: SP Valid Until: 2019-07-31) NO DIVERSE INFORMATION NOTE: WP EXT IN PROGRESS
------------------------------------
FAMILY COMPOSITION: SINGLE; never married No indication of previous marriages/cl partners No declared children
MEDICALS: All valid for 6 months or more PASSPORTS: All valid for 6 months or more
------------------------------------
WORK EXPERIENCE: Lock-in Date: 20 18-05-26 Primary Occupation: NOC 0601 Corporate sales managers EDUCATION CREDENTIAL(S) PROVIDED: Bachelor's Degree: NURSING; Diploma/Certificate: OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT (CANADIAN CREDENTIA L) 2016-03 to 2017-08 - Account Manager (NOC: 0601) - Letter dated 2018-04-16 appears to confirm employment in declared occupation throughout the specified period, and provides a job description which is consistent with the lead statement and main duties as set out in the declared NOC category. - Letter confirms salary ____ Letter confirms full/time employment; FSW Work : 1 year and 6 months. CRS Foreign Work: 1 year and 6 months. 2011-05 to 2011-10 - Staff Nurse (NOC: 3012) - - Letter dated 2018-05-18 appears to confirm employment in declared occupation throughout the specified period, and provides a job description which is consistent with the lead statement and main duties as set out in the declared NOC category. - Letter confirms salary ____, Letter confirms full/time employment; CRS Foreign Work: 0 years and 6 months. FSW Work: 1 year CRS Foreign Work : 2 year(s)
------------------------------------
EXPERIENCE: 2-3 year(s), 11 FSW Points
SETTLEMENT FUNDS: Review Required Approx. ______
Family of 1 requires CA ' $12 475 NOTE: REVIEW REQUIRED
I hope you have show a higher PoF in your bank letter or similar doc, and the documents you submitted are in line with the IRCC guidelines
Actually, that part of my application is sketchy because I'm under FSW but I submitted, as proof of funds, my Full Time Permanent Employment Contract and then my bank account reflects my car loan. But, I thought that should have been assessed during the R10 review and if Employment Contract is not sufficient for the FSW stream they should have rejected the application early on...... Right? Also, The note above is from the second officer, and I can see on the second page of the GCMS notes, my case have been assigned to a new officer... A third one I think? Geeezz I'm scared. And by the way thanks for your input!! Totally appreciate it!The only thing I can pick out from the notes is that the agent is pointing out that he need the case officer to review the PoF documents that you submitted.
I hope you have show a higher PoF in your bank letter or similar doc, and the documents you submitted are in line with the IRCC guidelines
hi can anyone explain the difference between Eligibility: recommend interview & Eligibility: interview required written in gcms notes
What does your Page# 2 and NOTES 1 & 2 say?Actually, that part of my application is sketchy because I'm under FSW but I submitted, as proof of funds, my Full Time Permanent Employment Contract and then my bank account reflects my car loan. But, I thought that should have been assessed during the R10 review and if Employment Contract is not sufficient for the FSW stream they should have rejected the application early on...... Right? Also, The note above is from the second officer, and I can see on the second page of the GCMS notes my case have been assigned to a new officer... A third one I think? Geeezz I'm scared. And by the way thanks for your input!! Totally appreciate it!
R.10 only assess if all documents are there or not, they do not check the quality of documentation provided. That is done beyond the R.10 stage i.e. at the Eligibility stage.
I don't also understand what you wrote above, I submitted, as proof of funds, my Full Time Permanent Employment Contract and then my bank account reflects my car loan
Oh right, I didn't say that clearly. I don't have enough liquid funds in my bank account, aside from the fact that I dont have the cash, I also have a car load under that bank account-- I submitted my bank statements, even if its not enough, I supplemented the document with my Employment Contract, its a salaried position, Full Time and Permanent.What does your Page# 2 and NOTES 1 & 2 say?
R.10 only assess if all documents are there or not, they do not check the quality of documentation provided. That is done beyond the R.10 stage i.e. at the Eligibility stage.
I don't also understand what you wrote above, I submitted, as proof of funds, my Full Time Permanent Employment Contract and then my bank account reflects my car loan
Significant info on Page 2
Eligibility: Review Required
Security: Not Started
Criminality: Passed
Medical: Passed
Info Sharing: Complete
Application Assignment:
Assigned to: CB01126
Assigned by: AF01137
Due Date: 2018/08/17
------------
Note 1 is the one I already posted.. Updated by: D0011
Note 2 updated by D0011
Label: General
Text: ***Agent Review*** Police Certificates R10 OK Criminality Decision Passed
Note 3
Updated by SM10353
Label: EE Eligibility
Review Type: Program Assistant: I have reviewed this application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant.......... Min Score: 444 CRS Score: 486 PA Application Promoted: Existing UCI... PA Medical Attached to UCI: YES.... IELTS: Met.... Education: Verified... Police Certificate PA RCMP Screening NRT 1.. Police Cert Provided- NRT R10 OK REcommendation: Pass Criminality---- AGE-- No change from ITA to e-APR Documents set for review: Client Information
The Employment Contract has no monetary value once you land in Canada and you need funds for your day-2-day expenses...Oh right, I didn't say that clearly. I don't have enough liquid funds in my bank account, aside from the fact that I dont have the cash, I also have a car load under that bank account-- I submitted my bank statements, even if its not enough, I supplemented the document with my Employment Contract, its a salaried position, Full Time and Permanent.
Significant info on Page 2
Eligibility: Review Required
Security: Not Started
Criminality: Passed
Medical: Passed
Info Sharing: Complete
Application Assignment:
Assigned to: CB01126
Assigned by: AF01137
Due Date: 2018/08/17
------------
Note 1 is the one I already posted.. Updated by: D0011
Note 2 updated by D0011
Label: General
Text: ***Agent Review*** Police Certificates R10 OK Criminality Decision Passed
Note 3
Updated by SM10353
Label: EE Eligibility
Review Type: Program Assistant: I have reviewed this application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant.......... Min Score: 444 CRS Score: 486 PA Application Promoted: Existing UCI... PA Medical Attached to UCI: YES.... IELTS: Met.... Education: Verified... Police Certificate PA RCMP Screening NRT 1.. Police Cert Provided- NRT R10 OK REcommendation: Pass Criminality---- AGE-- No change from ITA to e-APR Documents set for review: Client Information
You need to show clearly through your bank letter(money in bank account or in the form of FD etc) that you meet this threshold of $12,475. Any mortgages e.g. loan etc, will be shown as liability on your funds in the bank, hence you will need to show a higher cash deposit in your bank to cover this reduction.
Is it possible for you to ask your bank not include any loans etc in the bank letter?
Well I’m in Canada.. been here for a year now. Im under FSW-Inland and my Car Loan is with a Canadian bank account. I’d rather they see the loan so they know the bank granted me that because I can afford it.... pheeeewww! I honestly don’t know what to think anymore. Other than the bank account, do you see anything else alarming in the notes?The Employment Contract has no monetary value once you land in Canada and you need funds for your day-2-day expenses...
You need to show clearly through your bank letter(money in bank account or in the form of FD etc) that you meet this threshold of $12,475. Any mortgages e.g. loan etc, will be shown as liability on your funds in the bank, hence you will need to show a higher cash deposit in your bank to cover this reduction.
Is it possible for you to ask your bank not include any loans etc in the bank letter?
Thanks again!!!
You said you are in Canada, and currently working as here in a full time job(e.g. on a OPW)? If that's the case you are not required to provide any PoF...Well I’m in Canada.. been here for a year now. Im under FSW-Inland and my Car Loan is with a Canadian bank account. I’d rather they see the loan so they know the bank granted me that because I can afford it.... pheeeewww! I honestly don’t know what to think anymore. Other than the bank account, do you see anything else alarming in the notes?
Thanks again!!!
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/immigrate-canada/express-entry/documents/proof-funds.html
Note that you do not need proof of funds if you are currently:
- authorized to work in Canada and
- have a valid job offer
https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/fsw-cec-pof-for-ee-people-in-canada-working-can-show-0.280970/
Other than the PoF, i did not see anything else..
Yes under PGWP... so the part that says “and Valid job offer” is sketchy... because they defined Valid Job Offer as being supported by LMIA. And my contract is not LMIA supported because I’m on PGWP... also nowhere in the notes did they mention that I presented my contract as PoF, I find that weird.You said you are in Canada, and currently working as here in a full time job(e.g. on a OPW)? If that's the case you are not required to provide any PoF...
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/immigrate-canada/express-entry/documents/proof-funds.html
Note that you do not need proof of funds if you are currently:
were you aware of this ?
- authorized to work in Canada and
- have a valid job offer
https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/fsw-cec-pof-for-ee-people-in-canada-working-can-show-0.280970/
Other than the PoF, i did not see anything else..
PGWP is an OWP so you are authorized to work here...so in that case you do not need to show the PoF... I maybe wrong but get this double checked...Yes under PGWP... so the part that says “and Valid job offer” is sketchy... because they defined Valid Job Offer as being supported by LMIA. And my contract is not LMIA supported because I’m on PGWP... also nowhere in the notes did they mention that I presented my contract as PoF, I find that weird.
@DelPiero07 any thoughts?
Yeah I hope that is the case. I’ve reviewed that countless times before but that is clearly a grey area, because again of the definition they have on “Valid Job Offer”. If this wasn’t the case, they wouldnt have a reason to review my funds. Buuuttt I do hope you are right and I am wrong. Thank yah!PGWP is an OWP so you are authorized to work here...so in that case you do not need to show the PoF...
In the case of CEC, I had to confirm that I meet the PoF requirements in the EE profile. When I got the ITA, through my lawyer, I raised am LoE that I do not need to provide any PoF since I am a CEC, not sure if you were submitted such a LoE as part of your application?Yeah I hope that is the case. I’ve reviewed that countless times before but that is clearly a grey area, because again of the definition they have on “Valid Job Offer”. If this wasn’t the case, they wouldnt have a reason to review my funds. Buuuttt I do hope you are right and I am wrong. Thank yah!
Okay so Im not under CEC. I havent met the 1yr full time Canadian work experience req for that. but the way I submitted my PoF document was with a cover letter which we can consider as my LoE. It was a brief summary of what I had for my PoF. Explained I can totally support myself, then next pages were my contract, pay slip, and bank statement....In the case of CEC, I had to confirm that I meet the PoF requirements in the EE profile. When I got the ITA, through my lawyer, I raised am LoE that I do not need to provide any PoF since I am a CEC, not sure if you were submitted such a LoE as part of your application?
Lets wait for other senior members for there feedbackOkay so Im not under CEC. I havent met the 1yr full time Canadian work experience req for that. but the way I submitted my PoF document was with a cover letter which we can consider as my LoE. It was a brief summary of what I had for my PoF. Explained I can totally support myself, then next pages were my contract, pay slip, and bank statement....