+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
I have a query…I gave IELTS exam on 7th September 2019 but had to apply for revaluation and got my updated test results on 19th October 2019
What expiry date would be considered for the test results as per IRCC?
Is it October 2021 or September 2021?
Please reply.
 
I have a query…I gave IELTS exam on 7th September 2019 but had to apply for revaluation and got my updated test results on 19th October 2019
What expiry date would be considered for the test results as per IRCC?
Is it October 2021 or September 2021?
Please reply.

Expiry is always from the original date of the test.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timbuktu_14
I have a query…I gave IELTS exam on 7th September 2019 but had to apply for revaluation and got my updated test results on 19th October 2019
What expiry date would be considered for the test results as per IRCC?
Is it October 2021 or September 2021?
Please reply.
There will never be a definite answer to this question lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tristan-XI
Expiry is always from the original date of the test.
That’s clearly stated on IELTS page but as per IRCC requirement it’s not really specified anywhere (I’ll be glad to know if there’s a reference though). But my instincts always goes for 2 years from the date on your TRF (result). This is possibly why they ask for the date of results while creating/editing your profile
 
More Manitoba and BC PNP draws. Brace for a PNP/CEC draw this week I suppose
Doesn't equate to PNP/CEC draws though. It takes a while to actually get nominated. What they sent out this week were NOIs. Candidates still have to apply then wait for decisions. All of these can't happen in few days.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Nessa14
I have a query…I gave IELTS exam on 7th September 2019 but had to apply for revaluation and got my updated test results on 19th October 2019
What expiry date would be considered for the test results as per IRCC?
Is it October 2021 or September 2021?
Please reply.
Seems you asked Mark this question a few days ago? I'd go with the test date because that was when you were tested. Whatever you wrote or said was from that date. The result only came out later.
 
Seems you asked Mark this question a few days ago? I'd go with the test date because that was when you were tested. Whatever you wrote or said was from that date. The result only came out later.
Yes, he did. Your answer makes sense but would be quite unfair to people who had to remark and wait many weeks for new result
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tristan-XI
Its the same story in every country. Cost of housing. Build more, simple solution :D If there is a demand
 
This is a bu*****:

"But opening their borders anytime soon would expose their societies to the coronavirus. Analysts believe it could take a decade for Australian immigration to return to prepandemic levels. And closed borders reinforce anti-immigrant sentiment. The New Zealand government intends to permanently restrict immigration postpandemic. "

If you will allow only vaccinated people to come to your country you are not creating bigger risk from the risk you already have in your vaccinated population :D Who the hell wrote that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ita_drgen
This is a bu*****:

"But opening their borders anytime soon would expose their societies to the coronavirus. Analysts believe it could take a decade for Australian immigration to return to prepandemic levels. And closed borders reinforce anti-immigrant sentiment. The New Zealand government intends to permanently restrict immigration postpandemic. "

If you will allow only vaccinated people to come to your country you are not creating bigger risk from the risk you already have in your vaccinated population :D Who the hell wrote that?
That article is very poorly written. Once tourists are allowed, such statements will have no base in the public. I don't know anything about Australia but Canada's economy and demographics can't quite handle this pandemic-style immigration any longer. They're already an aging polulation and most (at least half) of the recent CEC immigrants will retire in less than 15-20 years. A decade? Canada's economy would crumble if the current damaged immigration system continued for another 2 years, let alone a decade.

There was article stating these concerns, can't find it now though. The foolishness of the article is evident by it's ending:

"
Whoever forms the government after the expected fall election should consider creating a commission of inquiry into immigration, with a mandate to determine how many immigrants Canada should be bringing in and how best to integrate them.
We must prevent the kind of polarization over newcomers that is tearing other countries apart, while preserving our diverse, open-hearted, multicultural society. Let’s just make sure we’re doing it right.
"

How is integration a problem all of a sudden? How did it come to polarization? Who is tearing what apart? Was the article not discussing the pandemic? Sorry but this is typical right-wing speech, just under disguise.

This is the sole reason, a real example of why people, regardless of their citizenship status or country, must not allow the "pandemic talk" anymore. It is actively being used as an excuse for political gain. When someone starts to talk about "cases", "variants", "risks", they must be actively, and immediately, shut down.
 
That article is very poorly written. Once tourists are allowed, such statements will have no base in the public. I don't know anything about Australia but Canada's economy and demographics can't quite handle this pandemic-style immigration any longer. They're already an aging polulation and most (at least half) of the recent CEC immigrants will retire in less than 15-20 years. A decade? Canada's economy would crumble if the current damaged immigration system continued for another 2 years, let alone a decade.

There was article stating these concerns, can't find it now though. The foolishness of the article is evident by it's ending:

"
Whoever forms the government after the expected fall election should consider creating a commission of inquiry into immigration, with a mandate to determine how many immigrants Canada should be bringing in and how best to integrate them.
We must prevent the kind of polarization over newcomers that is tearing other countries apart, while preserving our diverse, open-hearted, multicultural society. Let’s just make sure we’re doing it right.
"

How is integration is a problem all of a sudden? How did it come to polarization? Who is tearing what apart? Was the article not discussing the pandemic? Sorry but this is typical right-wing speech, just under disguise.

Totally agree with you on this one :D My first thought was - right-wing speech :)
As you have mentioned, Canada needs immigrants because of their ageing population. I have no idea why this guy started talking about polarization over newcomers that is tearing other countries apart. This is nonsense :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: ita_drgen
Doesn't equate to PNP/CEC draws though. It takes a while to actually get nominated. What they sent out this week were NOIs. Candidates still have to apply then wait for decisions. All of these can't happen in few days.
Yeah that's what I thought, but it was never clear if the provincial 'draws' were NOIs or profiles that had completed the provincial process, gotten the 600 points, and were waiting in the pool with 600+ scores for the next draw. "Manitoba invites 1000 candidates" could mean 1000 people managed to clear everything and got invited with the 600 points. I was never clear on what these draws actually meant