Ah sounds like Liquor
, Seagram would be my guess. I'm not sure how your Industry works, in the technology consulting industry even though we set a budget for the roles the candidate and niche nature of the skills/experience often lead to a demand for higher pay which goes for specific approvals, new recruits often or always get higher pay unless the candidate is dumb who most companies won't take.
Changing companies almost always leads to higher comps. It does hurt someone's chances in the long run though. A general rule of thumb for anyone > 10 years of exp is to see the next role as a $1-2 mil net output in 3-4 years. Job hopping puts more cash in hand, but keeps the pay linear for a very long time with the risk that it will plateau prematurely.Ah sounds like Liquor
I am working for a US company. My "org" or "department" is spread across India, Canada, US and UK. Like typically it happens in any big organization. My team works out of Vancouver.
Can anyone please explain to me why they always emphasize STEM category with impressive high ITAs number but in reality, the most ITAs category is French? Even healthcare does not have that much ITAs.
No real benefits except for politicians to get into voters good books.
So what is the point of announcing the important of STEM and all those news? Is that so ridiculous and giving fake hope?
I did, I am waiting for STEM draw, an international student and work for big company but there is no hope for me. Max out my score but cannot beat those fake LMIA and PNP. I am aware that PR is not compulsury and I am trying my best but it is unfair to see people outland without job coming and struggle while we spend good amount on education, have job and contribute to the society and left behind.
The funny thing is the government is convinced international students are "lucrative" because they bring money in to the Canadian economy. What they don't realize is that money is temporary. Most students from India study on a loan from an Indian bank. When they finish the studies they take a Canadian job (which drives down wages for Canadians) and then instead of spending their earnings inside the Canadian economy, they return the money back to India to pay back the Indian bank with interest. So the money leaves Canada and back to India in a few years. If you think about it, it is actually a net negative for Canada.
I totally understand your point. It would be the same with FSW applicants and PNP also right?
My point is maybe they should have new requirement for job offer not just experience, prioritize people with curent job and high salary like PNP requirment and even though money can flow back to their countries, tax money is collected at least.
What is your score? Like How can you study in Canada and even have a job and not get invited immediately? Not calling you out or anything just curious.
Not really because one of the major selling points by the government for increasing the number of international students is the huge amounts of money they supposedly bring into the Canadian economy. Even now the Indian media is shouting that Canada depends so much on Indian students to bring in money.
I have 468 which college degree and no previous experience in my country. Max can get for graduate with 1 year experience is 474 tho.
