+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

FSW WORLDWIDE

dankboi

VIP Member
Apr 19, 2021
3,687
11,099
London, United Kingdom
Category........
FSW
Hello all , I’m new in this group. I read all tye above and thanks for the important info,
I’m FSW I submitted my application on the 1 of aug, I did tye medical on the 15 of Sep ( passed) biometric 20 of sep . Till now still waiting and nothing happened, any positive news?
check this thread and compare it with your app timeline
 

dxdroid

Champion Member
Jun 21, 2021
1,788
1,529
WTF are you talking about. Read these articles slower and also use other sources:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/measles/index.html

Read it carefully:
One dose is about 93% effective while two doses of the vaccine are about 97% effective at preventing measles

Non of the vaccines give 100% protection. It does not mean you cannot be "infected" - once this virus will enter your system, your immune system will generate appropriate defence to kill it before it will vastly spread and make you severely ill. These are totally different diseases and you cannot compare every disease to Covid.
 

RSub

Champion Member
Aug 23, 2021
2,113
2,646
USA
Category........
FSW
Visa Office......
CPC Ottawa
AOR Received.
12-11-2020
Exactly what I am saying. When Pfizer and Moderna CEOs announced the vaccines with 90% efficacy in an apple-like event, everyone took a collective sigh and said "Phew. Pandemic? So 2020 lol". They used big words like mRNA and DNA in their press releases and we were all impressed.

Cut to the shitstorm right now. Why are we putting everyone who questions the vaccines on a cross? Why can't we objectively debate that vaccines haven't really been that effective.
It's a temporary fix a$$hole. Be glad that science stopped you from getting killed by covid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ar12345

dxdroid

Champion Member
Jun 21, 2021
1,788
1,529
It's a temporary fix a$$hole. Be glad that science stopped you from getting killed by covid.
He is saying that this vaccine has not been that effective hahahahahahahhahahah OMG
Hmmm considering the ratio of people being infected to the amount of people ending up in the hospitals specially elderly ones - yea, this vaccine is not that effective hahahahahahahhahaha
 
  • Like
Reactions: RSub

RSub

Champion Member
Aug 23, 2021
2,113
2,646
USA
Category........
FSW
Visa Office......
CPC Ottawa
AOR Received.
12-11-2020
Opinion: If immigrants are fit, willing and able, let’s certify them
Every year, hundreds of thousands of immigrants, many of them highly skilled, choose to make Canada their home. Far too often, however, skilled newcomers struggle to find work in their professions. They face significant financial and regulatory barriers that prevent them from fully integrating into the Canadian labour market and the sectors where their skills, training and experience are desperately needed.
Canadians obviously want to know that the various professionals they encounter are fully qualified. But raising certification barriers too high affects real people and their families and puts a damper on the Canadian economy. So it is good that new Ontario legislation may help speed up licencing for skilled newcomers — though it doesn’t go nearly far enough.

I recently met Moez, a trained pharmacist who immigrated from India in 2015. Despite working two jobs packaging orders at restaurants in Calgary he was not able to afford the cost of re-licensing to practice pharmacy in Canada. Relicensing costs for internationally trained pharmacists range from $9,000 to $25,000, depending on the province and the requirements to be fulfilled.

Such stories are common among immigrants. We’ve all heard of or met internationally-trained doctors, nurses or engineers who make a living driving taxis because they can’t get the certifications they need to work here — even though we are facing severe labour shortages in critical sectors such as health care as Canadian-born boomers retire. Job vacancies reached a record high in Canada in the third quarter of 2021, with 118,000, one-fifth of the total, reported in the health-care and social assistance sector. Employing skilled immigrants to fill these gaps will be key to Canada’s post-COVID recovery.

The good news is that recent legislation in Ontario amending The Fair Access to Regulated Professions and Compulsory Trades Act will significantly reduce licensing barriers for skilled newcomers. This first-of-its-kind legislation in the country will eliminate Canadian work experience requirements for certain professional registrations and licensing and reduce the duplication of official language proficiency testing for certain professional registrations and licensing, thus making newcomers employable faster in Canada.

This legislation is a step forward but we also need to address the sometimes high cost of licensing and reaccreditation. Re-licensing costs are often too high, and the process can take years to complete. In the meantime, our skilled immigrants languish in “survival” jobs, as their prospects for professional integration erode.

Let’s return to Moez. Fortunately, his story has a happy ending. He was referred to the national charity I head, Windmill Microlending, and we were able to provide both the advice and the affordable loan he needed to get certified and employed a pharmacist in Canada. He is now employed by Public Health Alberta and works on COVID-19 case investigations.

Not all support for new immigrants has to come from taxpayers. Charities play a vital role in their success. Over the past 16 years, Windmill has provided over 6,000 loans to help immigrants, including refugees, integrate into the labour market. Our low-interest loans of up to $15,000 can make all the difference: our clients more than triple their incomes , on average, by the time they repay their loans.

Talent is in short supply globally. Countries that attract and integrate internationally trained talent into their labour markets will be best positioned to compete. We need to do a better job of making sure the only barriers to labour market integration are legitimate ones.

Claudia Hepburn is CEO of Windmill Microlending, a national charity that helps skilled immigrants achieve economic prosperity through microloans and supports.

https://financialpost.com/opinion/opinion-if-immigrants-are-fit-willing-and-able-lets-certify-them
 
  • Like
Reactions: OneStepAtATime

dxdroid

Champion Member
Jun 21, 2021
1,788
1,529
No need to get your lungi in a twist, buddy. I am just saying that vaccines aren't as effective as they were advertised. Look how effective the vaccines are for other diseases. What we were jabbed with were prototypes of vaccines. The real vaccine, unfortunately, will come out after months - if not years of trial and error. Hopefully, by the time we won't need it.
Ohhhh boy. Read a little bit more about it and stop saying this s*** which is proven to be just s****. They are effective.
 

Newfoundland991

Star Member
Nov 25, 2020
58
41
Ohhhh boy. Read a little bit more about it and stop saying this s*** which is proven to be just s****. They are effective.
Suddenly the thread turned into discussion of this topic.
I’m curious, if “vaccine” is so effective why 80% of people that are getting infected now are fully jabbed, and 35% of those 80% are boosted too.
vaccine is possibly effetive against first strain from 2019 that is long gone.
Here is an interesting study:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1

TLDR:
Here is a short snapshot:
Results SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected, when the first event (infection or vaccination) occurred during January and February of 2021. The increased risk was significant (P<0.001) for symptomatic disease as well. When allowing the infection to occur at any time before vaccination (from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was demonstrated, though SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 5.96-fold (95% CI, 4.85 to 7.33) increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold (95% CI, 5.51 to 9.21) increased risk for symptomatic disease. SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees were also at a greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to those that were previously infected.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dxdroid

RSub

Champion Member
Aug 23, 2021
2,113
2,646
USA
Category........
FSW
Visa Office......
CPC Ottawa
AOR Received.
12-11-2020
No need to get your lungi in a twist, buddy. I am just saying that vaccines aren't as effective as they were advertised. Look how effective the vaccines are for other diseases. What we were jabbed with were prototypes of vaccines. The real vaccine, unfortunately, will come out after months - if not years of trial and error. Hopefully, by the time we won't need it.
If that is what
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: dxdroid and Ar12345

Ar12345

Star Member
Nov 11, 2020
184
243
No need to get your lungi in a twist, buddy. I am just saying that vaccines aren't as effective as they were advertised. Look how effective the vaccines are for other diseases. What we were jabbed with were prototypes of vaccines. The real vaccine, unfortunately, will come out after months - if not years of trial and error. Hopefully, by the time we won't need it.
A vaccine that's 90% effective (which is probably the lowest estimate and most are more effective) will leave you with a 10% chance of dying from COVID or being permanently disabled from long COVID if you take it. If you don't take it, you have a much higher chance of dying or being disabled than 10%. Most vaccines have an under 1% rate of giving you serious side effects if you don't have certain medical conditions (which is also a higher estimate).

So in essence, you consult your doctor and take something that'll 90% keep you safe and 99% not have side effects than taking nothing and drinking horse dewormer instead. That's the math for you. It's really not hard to figure out what's the best choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dxdroid

Ar12345

Star Member
Nov 11, 2020
184
243
Suddenly the thread turned into discussion of this topic.
I’m curious, if “vaccine” is so effective why 80% of people that are getting infected now are fully jabbed, and 35% of those 80% are boosted too.
vaccine is possibly effetive against first strain from 2019 that is long gone.
Here is an interesting study:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1

TLDR:
Here is a short snapshot:
Results SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected, when the first event (infection or vaccination) occurred during January and February of 2021. The increased risk was significant (P<0.001) for symptomatic disease as well. When allowing the infection to occur at any time before vaccination (from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was demonstrated, though SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 5.96-fold (95% CI, 4.85 to 7.33) increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold (95% CI, 5.51 to 9.21) increased risk for symptomatic disease. SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees were also at a greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to those that were previously infected.
Not peer reviewed . It's as good as me writing up something and posting it
 

Impatient Dankaroo

VIP Member
Jan 10, 2020
4,374
2,668
A vaccine that's 90% effective (which is probably the lowest estimate and most are more effective) will leave you with a 10% chance of dying from COVID or being permanently disabled from long COVID if you take it. If you don't take it, you have a much higher chance of dying or being disabled than 10%. Most vaccines have an under 1% rate of giving you serious side effects if you don't have certain medical conditions (which is also a higher estimate).

So in essence, you consult your doctor and take something that'll 90% keep you safe and 99% not have side effects than taking nothing and drinking horse dewormer instead. That's the math for you. It's really not hard to figure out what's the best choice.
Mate he's not anti vax or saying it isn't effective. He is just saying the effects are temporary and that the current vaccines aren't a long-term solution.

Same as flu shots don't prevent flu for life