This is all very strange...They didn't mean a VISA OFFICE officer? CIO charged CC, you didn't receive PER...because of what? Suddenly they changed their mind to not sent u PER and they put your app aside for further checking...? I do not get it. It could be equally a mistake in ECAS - 2 new lines are added mistakenly or CIO rejected or LVO rejected.hassanwiz17 said:
can u copy the internet link of this manual plz ?didi7878 said:From the manual of CIC:
"Note: The CIO will only make negative selection decisions. Only the responsible processing
office will make positive selection decisions, taking into account, but not limited to, the initial
assessment against selection criteria made by the CIO. In making a negative selection
decision, officers should clearly state the reasons for their decision in GCMS. "
If CIO has rejected ur file, so it means u have completed the first stages: completeness check and MI, but in a stage: SELECTION CRITERIA, after counting all points (if u could be economically established in Canada) -- in a word, decision made at this stage, at CIO, means that u missed points, the pass mark.
"The CIO will only assess applications that have met all the minimum requirements against the
selection criteria, and will award points against each of the six selection factors.
1)If the applicant's total score is...
equal to or greater than the pass mark set
by the Minister
Then the CIO will forward the entire application, including the
result of their initial assessment against the
selection criteria, to the office identified by the
applicant for processing on the IMM 0008 for a
final decision.
2) less than the pass mark set by the Minister
make a negative selection decision, record
the outcome and reasons in GCMS, and send
a letter to inform the applicant that their
application has been refused (see Appendix C
sample letter).
hassanwiz17 said:
DR-DARKMAN said:
Dr Darkman, check out the 'important links' on the spreadsheet view. second row "step by step procedure after receiving application FSW May4 2013 at CIO" pages 13 to 14.DR-DARKMAN said:
Shree1985's case seems to be similar to your case, wonder what his ECAS says.hassanwiz17 said:
Shree1985 said:
Shree1985 said:
Shree1985 said:
Shree1985 said:
Thanks DRDR-DARKMAN said:
It is still not clear where the refusal if indeed, is coming from wether it is from the CIO or LVO. We have seen a case here where someone received a rejection from the CIO even after his cc got charged. I would suggest you be patient until you get a formal email telling you about the refusal or alternatevely since you have your UCI number you send email to both the CIO and your LVO asking about the status of your application.hassanwiz17 said:
It is strange, indeed.Gandalf said:
hassanwiz17 said:
didi7878 said:From the manual of CIC:
"Note: The CIO will only make negative selection decisions. Only the responsible processing
office will make positive selection decisions, taking into account, but not limited to, the initial
assessment against selection criteria made by the CIO. In making a negative selection
decision, officers should clearly state the reasons for their decision in GCMS. "
If CIO has rejected ur file, so it means u have completed the first stages: completeness check and MI, but in a stage: SELECTION CRITERIA, after counting all points (if u could be economically established in Canada) -- in a word, decision made at this stage, at CIO, means that u missed points, the pass mark.
"The CIO will only assess applications that have met all the minimum requirements against the
selection criteria, and will award points against each of the six selection factors.
1)If the applicant's total score is...
equal to or greater than the pass mark set
by the Minister
Then the CIO will forward the entire application, including the
result of their initial assessment against the
selection criteria, to the office identified by the
applicant for processing on the IMM 0008 for a
final decision.
2) less than the pass mark set by the Minister
make a negative selection decision, record
the outcome and reasons in GCMS, and send
a letter to inform the applicant that their
application has been refused (see Appendix C
sample letter).
The point most guys are missing is here is that his application NOC is 2263. If I am not wrong, I read quiet a few times here that it is very regulated & critical job NOC. The Visa Officers @ NS after carefully reviewing his application may have concluded that this applicant has either not performed in most of the job duties OR technically unfit for the job in light of his either education or experience. The decision has been made at NS & not at LVO. Doesn't matter if it has been recorded in ECAS or not.mabmab said:
