Good Day,
Justice Barnes dismissed the motion, holding back his decision for six months in order to prejudice our case. However, if Justice Barnes smugly believes that he has successfully done the Minister's bidding, he will find that his glee is premature.
Justice Rennie, who will be presiding at the January hearing, ordered me on December 10th to proceed with only one lead case and only for a file which had been closed by s. 87.4. In so doing, he toed the line DoJ counsel Martin Anderson dictated. Likewise, when the Court gave my group different dates for submitting additional material, Justice Rennie reversed himself when Martin Anderson told him that he "must" do so.
Thank you for your kind words and understanding. I greatly appreciate both. While I share your concern, trust me, it is not over yet. I still have a few more arrows in my quiver, and will be letting one of them fly the first week of January, when I move into Phase II of my litigation.
In addition, I am planning to file a class-action lawsuit on January 2nd solely for the Emam contingent if the Minister refuses to access s. 25.2(1) to comply with our February 3rd Agreement just as he did on November 29th for those whose files had been assessed after March 29th but whose visas were issued after June 29th.
As Winston Churchill defiantly proclaimed after the Fall of France and while Nazi bombs were raining down on London: "This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end, but it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning".
Regards
Tim Leahy