Hi! Newbie here our application was received by Missisauga on Feb. 25, 2015. Now we did upfront medical. Just want to ask, mgnotify pa ba ang manila office pag nareceive na nila docs natin from Missisauga? Application received pa rin kasi status on my PR application e. Thanks in advance guys!gd_lm said:Couldn't find a thread for February 2015 Outland applications, so thought I would start one. Application went in the mail today. Now we wait!
Congrats and Best of Luck.misteece said:Guess what it's AOR 2 from Singapore VO...
You got my hopes up that they'd released a quarterly update. As an aside, try using the table/row/cell tags next time for more readable pasting.irvah said:Hello everybody:
CIC released case processing time for spouses by Visa Office.
http://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/427337d0-7c36-4fed-8428-c6a63f8c19b3
Below is the data for the last period of 12 month (October 01, 2013-September 30, 2014). You can download table and sort data by type of cases and see % number of cases completed within X months or less and total number of cases by VO.
Here all data related to Family Class (Priority – Spouses & Partners)
irvah said:Thank you, Mapleson
I am still new here, I kept trying to insert data in table with no success((
So, decided that some information is better than no information)
In my case I got a hope to be in 50% of cases that Tel Aviv VO will complete approximately in 7 months and meet my husband here in December 2015
[table]
[tr][td]Row 1[/td][td]Column 2[/td][/tr]
[tr][td]Row 2[/td][td]Column 2[/td][/tr]
[/table]
Row 1 | Column 2 |
Row 2 | Column 2 |
You can always file a $5 FOI request. I've got a pretty good idea of what information they have in what directories and file names, and I've recreated the raw data on the locked pages if you're interested.Sheps said:Man... Tempted to see if I can get more information. Gives me an interesting thesis idea. haha.
I was originally thinking of developing an app that would replace the spreadsheets, collect a lot more information but keep most of it hidden (except for allowing some analysis to be done on the data). I was mainly interested in type of "proof" that was submitted, Age gap, Same Sex vs Opposite Sex, Race vs citizenship, etc. I have the database partially modelled but no interface.Mapleson said:You might be able to create a good dataset from here. It depends on the scope of your analysis. It might be better to first identify what percentage of people are eliminated due to obvious conditions. If the overall approval rate is 86% and 90% of the remainder is explained between lack of evidence of relationship, criminal backgrounds, or medical exclusion, would it be worth while to dig deeper into the data to explain the remaining 1.4%?