Dear Asivad and senior members, I have a few peculiar questions which are raising concerns. Hope to get lucid clarifications.
Q1) Whether for me (principal applicant) or for my spouse should I include only and only those work experiences, while filling up the post-ITA form, which I can support by a clear set of documents (appointment letter + experience certificate + jobs and responsibilities letter + pay stubs) for each experience mentioned?
Only and only those experiences that you are claiming points for under CRS and/or program eligibility.
Is mentioning of any work experience considered by CIC as claiming it? Can I claim points for some work exp and merely mention others (without claim)?
Yes. The officer will either apply their discretion or proceed with your explanation (if provided) if you mention something in there without wanting to claim points for it.
If I mention any unclaimed work exp without supporting documents will the trigger-happy CIC base my rejection on this even if I am getting complete points from other work exp?
Not at all. But this is just an unnecessary complication. When you know someone is potentially trigger-happy, you would try and minimize risk, right?
Q2) Under travel history section of principal applicant if some foreign trips are mentioned am I obliged to repeat the same information under travel history section for SPOUSE's family member???
Yes. Separate individual, separate passport stamp.
Do I need to mention my/spouse sister's foreign trip who will not be accompanying with me/us to Canada?
No.
Q3) I, as principal applicant, applied to CIC for PR under FSWP 2014. The application was rejected with a UCI number. Although I am sure that it was neither my spouse nor my kid who applied to CIC but should I leave empty the UCI field in their respective sections? What I think is that UCI number is always linked with the principal applicant, ain't it?
UCI number is for the application - if they were a part of your 2014 application, mention the same UCI in their section as well, if asked.
Many thanks in advance to put efforts in clarifying these severe doubts. These confusions are really holding up the PR pipeline!