mats said:
I would like to know how many in this SR group had RQ? I am guessing that not many had the RQ. If so, what is the criteria for RQ? Is it just minimum days like less than 800? Is there anyone who had 1000 plus days residence in Canada and still got RQ? Thanks for the inputs.
To be clear, there is more than one "group" involved in SR referrals.
In any event, there is an obvious correlation between cutting the PR Residency Obligation close (such as less than 900 days presence in Canada, and especially less than 800 days) and the risk of Secondary Review, but what tends to be glossed over or dismissed is the import of the fact that most of these are PRs who reported (in the PR card application) presence in Canada for at least 730 days.
Those who report less than 730 days presence will be assessed for H&C reasons.
Those who report at least 730 days
claim they have met the PR RO.
So an inquiry into whether or not the latter (those reporting 730+) actually met the PR RO
necessarily entails an inquiry into whether the PR made MISREPRESENTATIONS as to their time in Canada and out of Canada.
Thus, among the
cutting-it-close PRs, there are at least two groups: those who cut-it-close but who are more or less clearly well-settled
permanently in Canada versus those who IRCC might perceive as
not-so-settled in Canada. Most indications are that the former tend to have a significantly shorter and less problematic SR timeline (see reports by
tom94063 for example), while in contrast there is a higher risk of problems and a much longer timeline for the latter, for those who circumstances or history might lead IRCC to perceive they are not so well settled in Canada.
Otherwise, there are undoubtedly many, many factors which can affect whether or not a PR card application will be referred to SR, and affect how it will go when referred to SR. There can be and often is a widely different impact for one PR in SR than there is for another. See, for example, above discussions regarding those who have minimal problems traveling abroad without a PR card versus those for whom the risk of travel abroad appears to be too high to take.
Many of the criteria are undoubtedly easy to guess: discrepancies between reported travel dates and the CBSA travel history; historical RO concerns; PRs with multiple Travel Documents; suspicious address, telephone number, or employer; pattern of absences in conjunction with other information indicating lack of real permanent residence in Canada . . . any of these tend to raise the potential for misrepresentation, which in and of itself can lead to loss of PR status. Additionally, suspicion that the PR is residing abroad while the application is pending tends to increase the risk of SR and the risk of problems in SR.
In any event, yes, there have been sporadic, isolated reports of some PRs reporting a lot more time in Canada nonetheless being referred to SR. Remember, SR can also be about suspected criminality or security issues (and as to the latter, more time abroad tends to elevate the risk of a security concern), and it can be about suspected misrepresentation some time in the past, in any previous CBSA or IRCC transaction (all the way back to the individual's first application to obtain any status in Canada).