I still see just personal opinions about me, without any prove that I am wrong.screech339 said:You seem to be the kind that despite all the evidence and words written in law and new regulations presented to you, you still think the sky is purple.
Screech339
Did you read that I am not ignoring the keeping residency requirement valid until the oath, which is a solid reason for rejection.
If the person manage to maintain his residency by staying here at least 6 months in a calendar year, and the rest of the time is abroad, there is no reason for him to worry about the moral value clause because the residency is there and it is still valid.
But at the same time the majority of time is spend abroad.
There is no direct implementation for rejection in that case based on moral value clauses.