I really like this reply, it has a lot of sense. Thank you.
I've been thinking about this topic today since we had that conversation a few posts above. And same as you said, I'd never understand how 3 weeks vacation could mean "I'm not residing in Canada".
Answering
@schweisy 's question if I want to be right or approved: there are different cases. Some people may realize they already had 3-4 weeks vacation and now they found out it can cause issues and they try to understand if it really would or would not cause anything.
I never argue with anybody just for the sheer purpose of arguing. In every case I'm trying to understand for myself and for future readers of this forum what consequences might be risen after any potentially harmful actions.
I actually didn't intend to suggest you were arguing for the sake of it, I was trying to point out that you may be totally right according to your interpretation of the law, but in the end it's the officer's interpretation of the law that counts. So you can argue your logic and we can find it utterly persuasive but unfortunately, I think we have seen many a time that these things are neither as logical nor as consistent as we would like, and, most importantly,
the officer has significant discretion in how they choose to interpret your case.
Think about how many aspects of the application itself (or, equally, a justification for leaving during the application process) has to do with the applicant having an "intention" to do something, which is
extremely subjective. You might feel totally secure knowing you really do have an intention, but if the immigration officer doesn't see it like you do, well, tough, they make the decisions. It's not a black-and-white, scientific process; it's still performed by a fallible human. So why give them any opportunity to misinterpret anything?
As applicants we all feel a ton of anxiety and often engage in exquisite levels of tea-leaf reading trying to predict outcomes (and us here even more than most
), but you're looking for a concrete answer where there just isn't one. Commenters are simply trying to point out the potential risks -- it's then up to the individual to use their judgement alone to decide what level of risk they're comfortable with.