FWSAPPLICANT said:
Hi to ALL,
It seems that CIC stopped charging NOC 2172 after 15 DEC. On this forum people may have this idea that NOC 2172 has been flooded by applicants who have actually applied under NOC 2171/2173 in first place or those who have changed their mind at last moment and filed their applications under NOC 2172 while previously they were preparing their case for other NOCs may be 2171/2173, and a lot of such applicants didn't enter their details in spreadsheet.
I really need your help to understand
1) How come a person who is working in some reputable organization may able to get signed JD for two different kind of jobs? I don't think so that any sense able employer will sign two different JDs in just one to two months time.
2) Those who have already applied, how they managed to get second IELTS report? British council do not provide second IELTS report to any candidate.
3) CIC is so sluggish that they cannot keep track of a person who is applying with different NOCs with different JD letters? NOC 2172 has no match with NOC 2171 or 2173 the duties are totally different in nature.
Application filed under NOC 2172
Application received date 15/12/2014
Payment Mode DD (Waiting for any status)
Well, many of those who work in 2173/2171/2174 also do the JD described by NOC 2172.
I, for example, have got a letter where first year and half it is 2172, then two years as 2173 and finally 2174 - ensuring that in worst case, I will have options in the future that wont conflict with what is recorded in GCMS system.
I don't know how many of the applicants were smart enough to get such a letter, but I would assume many.
About second point - as someone said, its possible to obtain extra copies of IELTS (although I suppose it takes some time), but there are a lot of other documents to prepare such as notary translations etc which cost another small fortune.
So it is my hope (evil, I know hehe) that many of them didnt have extra original IELTS, or original ECA report, or original translations, and hence their second application would be invalidated.
About your third point - I too am wondering about it, and very much hoping CIC is not that stupid to just send back all over the CAP NOC applications without recording submitted NOC employment history into GCMS, so that any future application that contradicts the first one - would be invalidated (and the applicant would face a 2 year ban on immigration applications).
This is my hope of course, in practice we don't know what is happening, this is the first time there is a separate quota for each NOC, and in reality, it takes time for the government to catch up to people's clever schemes.
