Oh boy! But my friends of Feb-2020, they also sent paper applications, how come they are getting invites, when they are just like 2019 paper applications?
Consider them lucky . In fall it will be delta and in winter its going to Beta and Spring its going to be Alpha
Online application started only early Dec 2020 so anyone who applied from Jan to at least Nov 2020 including myself used paper.
That makes it even more strange the fact that 2020 applications are moving far faster than those of 2019.
Not at all if you think about it, with 2020 applications they can still meet their goal of processing 80% of applicants in 1 or 1.5 year that is why they are pushing and we are seeing more and more test invites.. Oath , sad to say but there is no way they can meet that goal with 2018/2019 applications and yes it's not fair.
All good. At the end of the day, we are all here trying to help each other by speculating from the information we receive or the experience we have had. And that's true, it's not easy to choose but if you have completed test, it definitely is pointless. Hopefully you get a decision soon!I just re-read my post, and I can see how it could come across as passive-aggressive, so I apologize! What I was trying to say is that when it comes to withdrawing a paper application to re-apply online, your case was likely unique since you applied for urgent processing, which the majority of us can't justify. I definitely thought about re-applying online, especially when I saw December 2020 applicants becoming citizens in like 3-4 months, but ultimately decided against it. I took my test earlier this month, and now I can only hope that it won't be another 8 months of silence from IRCC
I think a decade or so ago they decided to dump a bunch of PR applications and asked people to reapply. Probably not 3 yrs but a year maybe who knows. Lol.
Yep. I am really curious to find out what information they will release to me.
Say from your experiece , your eligibility is in progress and then they transfer your file for clearances even though your background is complete. What do u think, what clearances could they be ?
Not entirely sure but I have noticed sometimes Sydney will apply a "batch update" to applications even if they have been transferred to local offices which could possibly trigger that. The file might actually just require someone to manually change it back to completed?
Nop the file is sitting in the registry at the local office but the app status reason says - TFR- Clearances ( transferred for clearances). It is stil at the local office. so what clearances could it be ?
If you have the notes, follow the Paper File History or Application trail and carefully look at every status change. You might find the answer you are looking nfor.Nop the file is sitting in the registry at the local office but the app status reason says - TFR- Clearances ( transferred for clearances). It is stil at the local office. so what clearances could it be ?
The "advocates" Facebook group had been leading this. They should know what can be done at this point.So back to the topic of this thread.....apart from writing to our MPs and using the Twitter hashtag, what else we could be doing? The OP mentioned this regarding the spousal sponsorship group:
They held simultaneous protests in front of several IRCC offices across the country, in Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa and Edmonton.
I'm fairly certain we can't discuss something like that in this forum, though. Would it be against the rules if we were to talk about peaceful demonstrations? I'm just not sure what else we can do at this point
