CIC started rejecting NOC 1111, 0111...............

[shibuya]

This is a absolute baseless allegation on CIC. If the rejection letter is posted here on the forum we could conclude on this row.
But again the rejection letter could be modified by Nema & co. :-[

 

[nema]

Guys

we are all at risk for being pre June applicant having lost position in NOC.

 

[nema]

I have no comment for those who don't believe me. what i am writing i based on the evidence i have seen visibly.

I cant write the whole statements of visa consular here; but mention single line which is enough to understand......


"I am not convinced with your work experience and supporting documents in the light of ministerial instruction announced June 26, 2010."

 

[Purkoni]

If you can not write that statement you can scan and shaw to all of us!
It will be fer from your side.

 

[Mogboy]

Government workers do not write in the first person, this cannot be real.

 

[Mogboy]

The sentence quoted by Nema is in appalling English and I doubt that anyone with that level of education would be employed at the Delhi office.

 

[Mogboy]

Hi,

I live in Toronto. If anyone is hoping to move here and I can be of any assistance I will do my best to answer your questions. I wish you all the very best of luck. You will find Canada a welcoming place.

 

[canadaforall]

The sentence quoted by Nema is in appalling English and I doubt that anyone with that level of education would be employed at the Delhi office.

I agree with you. Let him scan and paste the copy, for us to have a look.

Waiting then.

 

[haral]

thats a pretty normal statement in rejection letter to someone who has'nt been able to provide proof they fall in the NOC they applied in...... seems to me your case is rejected...i am sorry for you.....

I have no comment for those who don't believe me. what i am writing i based on the evidence i have seen visibly.

I cant write the whole statements of visa consular here; but mention single line which is enough to understand......


"I am not convinced with your work experience and supporting documents in the light of ministerial instruction announced June 26, 2010."

 

[vermas]

I think this rejection was because of the poor quality of documents submitted. If the applicant met Ministrial Instructions-1 at the time of applying, the application would be assessed and processed accordingly.

I have no comment for those who don't believe me. what i am writing i based on the evidence i have seen visibly.

I cant write the whole statements of visa consular here; but mention single line which is enough to understand......


"I am not convinced with your work experience and supporting documents in the light of ministerial instruction announced June 26, 2010."

 

[haral]

I guess the best thing in such threads where rumours are ebing spread should be to completely ignore them.....Let the ignorant feed on rotten fish.......

 

[coolguy2010]

This is a absolute baseless allegation on CIC. If the rejection letter is posted here on the forum we could conclude on this row.
But again the rejection letter could be modified by Nema & co. :-[

agree with shibu.....

there are some negative people on this forum (like nema) who just know to spread rumours.


Regards
Cool

 

[nema]

Hi guys

see this rejection letter:

“You have indicated that you have work experience in an occupation with the following NOC (National Occupational Classification) code: 1111 - ACCOUNTANT. Although this NOC code corresponds to the occupations specified in the Instructions identified by the Minister, you have not provided sufficient evidence that you performed the actions described in the lead statement for the occupation or that you performed a substantial number of the main duties of the occupation as set out in the occupational description of the NOC- 1111; ACCOUNTANT, including all of the essential duties.

After taking into consideration the work experience supporting documentation on file, I am not satisfied that you have performed the actions described in the lead statement for the occupation or that you performed a substantial number of the main duties of an ACCOUNTANT. As such, I am not satisfied that you are really a ACCOUNTANT - 1111

 

[vermas]

It clearly indicates that rejection is due to poor/insufficient documents submitted. Please do not generalise rejection of certain NOCs.

Hi guys

see this rejection letter:

“You have indicated that you have work experience in an occupation with the following NOC (National Occupational Classification) code: 1111 - ACCOUNTANT. Although this NOC code corresponds to the occupations specified in the Instructions identified by the Minister, you have not provided sufficient evidence that you performed the actions described in the lead statement for the occupation or that you performed a substantial number of the main duties of the occupation as set out in the occupational description of the NOC- 1111; ACCOUNTANT, including all of the essential duties.

After taking into consideration the work experience supporting documentation on file, I am not satisfied that you have performed the actions described in the lead statement for the occupation or that you performed a substantial number of the main duties of an ACCOUNTANT. As such, I am not satisfied that you are really a ACCOUNTANT - 1111

 

[eemmoo1]

Hi guys

see this rejection letter:

“You have indicated that you have work experience in an occupation with the following NOC (National Occupational Classification) code: 1111 - ACCOUNTANT. Although this NOC code corresponds to the occupations specified in the Instructions identified by the Minister, you have not provided sufficient evidence that you performed the actions described in the lead statement for the occupation or that you performed a substantial number of the main duties of the occupation as set out in the occupational description of the NOC- 1111; ACCOUNTANT, including all of the essential duties.

After taking into consideration the work experience supporting documentation on file, I am not satisfied that you have performed the actions described in the lead statement for the occupation or that you performed a substantial number of the main duties of an ACCOUNTANT. As such, I am not satisfied that you are really a ACCOUNTANT - 1111

So Mr/s Nema,

Would you mind mentionin where it is written that the application is rejected as NOC is no more in the list??????????