CIC started rejecting NOC 1111, 0111...............

[pittabread]

The sentence "We are now not only considering 67 points but also the overall potentialities of applicants" is is completely ambiguous. The next line "Now visa officer should be fully satisfied with the applicants' documents rather than point scoring." clears the ambiguity. 8)

waiting for your request to be completed

If you say the next line that "Now visa officer should be fully satisfied with the applicants' documents rather than point scoring" clears the ambiguity then its nothing new as visa officers before also needed to be satisfied with applicants documents rather than point scoring. Only that potentialities thing is a new thing and carries some weight.

Basically he is trying to confuse people by going left, right and not telling the exact thing. Waiting for him to post rejection letter.

Thanks

 

[ryan niazi]

Dear all I think this News seems to be just a splinter aired by many people like Nector from time to time ,Canada has a very good record of fundamental human rights,they are simply best in preserving people rights ,they will never divest someone on the basis of this base-less thing ,if they had to do it all they could have told this to people in advance i.e before applying,now even if they have removed few NOCs at the moment, they still need those people with deleted NOCs ,remember they had removed these NOCs for their futuristic planning i.e inoder to keep the balance of job demand and supply in balance,

dont get panic and worried I gurantee you that this News is nothing to do with NOC,yes there is a chance of rejection on the basis of points,eg many of us even are confused at calculating their academic points ,I even miscalculated my points till my 1st AOR ,later on I managed to improve my score/points through IELTS,many people in pakistan consider their MBBS,Engineering degrees to be awarding them 22 points which they actually miscalculate ,the situation gets clear when at vo stage they get rejected,similarly many counts thei spouse points to be 3 from FA/Fsc. which is again a wrong calculation on their part ,
If i get rejected that will be because of the points factors ,NOCs in demand or out of demand have nothing to do with these things ,and lastly VO assesses each case on first come first serve basis ,the cases with too many complications take longer time as compared to a case with simplicity and straightforwardness,
Hope all this will remove the confusion,
Ryan niazi

 

[pittabread]

Dear all I think this News seems to be just a splinter aired by many people like Nector from time to time ,Canada has a very good record of fundamental human rights,they are simply best in preserving people rights ,they will never divest someone on the basis of this base-less thing ,if they had to do it all they could have told this to people in advance i.e before applying,now even if they have removed few NOCs at the moment, they still need those people with deleted NOCs ,remember they had removed these NOCs for their futuristic planning i.e inoder to keep the balance of job demand and supply in balance,

dont get panic and worried I gurantee you that this News is nothing to do with NOC,yes there is a chance of rejection on the basis of points,eg many of us even are confused at calculating their academic points ,I even miscalculated my points till my 1st AOR ,later on I managed to improve my score/points through IELTS,many people in pakistan consider their MBBS,Engineering degrees to be awarding them 22 points which they actually miscalculate ,the situation gets clear when at vo stage they get rejected,similarly many counts thei spouse points to be 3 from FA/Fsc. which is again a wrong calculation on their part ,
If i get rejected that will be because of the points factors ,NOCs in demand or out of demand have nothing to do with these things ,and lastly VO assesses each case on first come first serve basis ,the cases with too many complications take longer time as compared to a case with simplicity and straightforwardness,
Hope all this will remove the confusion,
Ryan niazi

I agree with you but I do not understand why people spread these kind of rumours and what motive can be behind this ??

 

[ryan niazi]

I agree with you but I do not understand why people spread these kind of rumours and what motive can be behind this ??

sir I think they do so just to share some News which actually has nothing to do with reality ,when such people are asked to produce the source ,they cannt provide it because they actually donnt have such source,its just a publicity stunt,
we people are connected to this forum to share our own experiences of immigration or to provide people with the information that has authenticity,

 

[pittabread]

sir I think they do so just to share some News which actually has nothing to do with reality ,when such people are asked to produce the source ,they cannt provide it because they actually donnt have such source,its just a publicity stunt,
we people are connected to this forum to share our own experiences of immigration or to provide people with the information that has authenticity,

I guess this is because of frustrtations coming out due to long wait or somebody unfortunately got rejected and taking his frustration out this way or somebody just wanted public opinion on this issue but only God knows better.

Thanks

 

[tarakrs]

Why are some people in this thread are removing their frustration in negative manner?

If they did not want 0111 and 1111 then, they would not have put them in MI 1.

You cant spread negative news because that what you think... Many people struggle here to keep their hope alive, they try hard to be positive and some JERKS just make them to think negative and demoralize them because they are having negative attitudes towards life....

I won't use the name but, you need to stop doing it... If you have any concrete information about ur posts then only post such information

 

[ryan niazi]

Why are some people in this thread are removing their frustration in negative manner?

If they did not want 0111 and 1111 then, they would not have put them in MI 1.

You cant spread negative news because that what you think... Many people struggle here to keep their hope alive, they try hard to be positive and some JERKS just make them to think negative and demoralize them because they are having negative attitudes towards life....

I won't use the name but, you need to stop doing it... If you have any concrete information about ur posts then only post such information

I clearly second this opinion,

 

[fireworks]

Why are some people in this thread are removing their frustration in negative manner?

If they did not want 0111 and 1111 then, they would not have put them in MI 1.

You cant spread negative news because that what you think... Many people struggle here to keep their hope alive, they try hard to be positive and some JERKS just make them to think negative and demoralize them because they are having negative attitudes towards life....

I won't use the name but, you need to stop doing it... If you have any concrete information about ur posts then only post such information

Hi,
Keep the hopes alive.
They can't reject the entire lot.
I'll let you know about their attitude on 0111/1111 after my interview.
It would be helpful to many of ppl here, I think.
Good Luck.

 

[ryan niazi]

Hi,
Keep the hopes alive.
They can't reject the entire lot.
I'll let you know about their attitude on 0111/1111 after my interview.
It would be helpful to many of ppl here, I think.
Good Luck.

thanks and keep us updated dear,
Ryan Niazi

 

[pittabread]

Here he goes again

http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/un-believable-buffalo-visa-office-has-started-rejecting-noc-315107114121-t72277.0.html

 

[(INDIAN)]

what noc code for instructor these r also in same catagory

 

[ryan niazi]

Here he goes again

http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/un-believable-buffalo-visa-office-has-started-rejecting-noc-315107114121-t72277.0.html

the best thing is not to concentrate on such news specially by Newbys

 

[haral]

they should definitely reject your's if they have'nt already done so for being a liar.....
:-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-\ :-\ :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-*

Dear all

many many thanks for reply and comments. i mean that we are all at risk for being pre June applicants having out listed in NOC. I had mentioned above concerning accountants, finance manager and auditors. Likewise other occupations which are not listed in NOC now have been posed ever higher risk. anything can happen even whatever the status may be in ecas.

In rejection letter they have written that We are now not only considering 67 points but also the overall potentialities of applicants. Now visa officer should be fully satisfied with the applicants' documents rather than point scoring.

God bless you

 

[haral]

mate there's no motive except some people have their heads infected with bad vibes...i persume this person has been rejected and wants to demotivate others as well. if he was at the wheels he would have rejected everyone just because he also was....
bunch of immature, small headed retards who take pleasure in lying....

I agree with you but I do not understand why people spread these kind of rumours and what motive can be behind this ??

 

[salmanahm]

Thats not possible. Rejection at which stage ????

Probably someone sent an application ignoring the 29 occupation list and got this kind of reply at CIC stage. But after the PER rejection at VO is not possible due to this reason.
Regards
Salman