+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Bill C-6: Senate stage

spiritsoul

Hero Member
Jan 9, 2013
448
35
Mississauga
Category........
FSW
Visa Office......
London
NOC Code......
2511
App. Filed.......
28-03-2011
AOR Received.
02-05-2011
File Transfer...
02-05-2011
Med's Request
25-11-2012
Med's Done....
17-01-2013
Interview........
Nil
Passport Req..
18-02-2013
VISA ISSUED...
11-03-2013
LANDED..........
16-06-2013
admontreal said:
If we have the Libs and Non-Aff on the same side it's still good no ? I know it's not guaranteed but I hope JT wasn't dumb enough to select Senators that may give a hard time to his bills.
You're right but the fact is there is some Non-affiliated senators were appointed by Harper.
 

admontreal

Hero Member
Feb 15, 2011
326
9
Montreal, QC
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
spiritsoul said:
You're right but the fact is there is some Non-affiliated senators were appointed by Harper.
True. What I hope is that when they left Harper's caucus they also left the mentality that goes with it and would be inclined to compromise and follow the other Non-Affiliated Senators lead.
Honestly, Partisanship is an inherent part of Human nature. Most of the Senators don't give a leg about C-6's meaning and results, they just want to be on the winning side. By default, it's the government, and if they are not bound to Tories by any formal partisanship line they may follow the growing crowd of C-6 ays...
 

Sumonaney

Hero Member
Nov 29, 2012
261
8
spiritsoul said:
You're right but the fact is there is some Non-affiliated senators were appointed by Harper.
then why some Non-affiliated senators appoint by JUSTIN T.
Then this bill will approve so quick
 

marcher

Hero Member
Mar 30, 2016
534
61
admontreal said:
True. What I hope is that when they left Harper's caucus they also left the mentality that goes with it and would be inclined to compromise and follow the other Non-Affiliated Senators lead.
Honestly, Partisanship is an inherent part of Human nature. Most of the Senators don't give a leg about C-6's meaning and results, they just want to be on the winning side. By default, it's the government, and if they are not bound to Tories by any formal partisanship line they may follow the growing crowd of C-6 ays...
Keep in mind that each Senator is free to vote as he or she pleases. It is true that those appointed by Harper might vote against C-6, but that would be because they believe C-24 is right. At this stage, they do not have to care about what Harper says because he is gone from the political scene. The other thing we need to keep in mind is that there may be several other Senators (Liberal and independent) who might disagree with C-6. In all honesty, it depends on how they view it. If they focus on the fact C-6 will allow a terrorist to keep his citizenship, then they might disagree with it. But if they are more open minded and see how this rule may go beyond what it says, then they might think otherwise. All of us on this forum are super biased because we are directly affected by C-24, hence we want C-6 implemented ASAP. The Senators are not necessarily affected by it, so they are not biased. Now their opinions will be subjective basic on the logic they adopt. In all fairness, Senator Frum is not some evil witch who hates immigrants and wants to make life difficult for them. She believes C-24 solves the issue in hand, and defended it accordingly.
 

asifmehmood

Hero Member
May 28, 2009
371
61
Category........
Visa Office......
London
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
May 2008
Doc's Request.
Aug 2012
IELTS Request
Submitted with docs
File Transfer...
April 2011
Med's Request
Nov 2012
Med's Done....
Dec 2012
Passport Req..
31/01/13, received at LVO 04/02/13
VISA ISSUED...
25/02/13
LANDED..........
Sept 2013
started discussing Bill C-6!
 

monalisa

Hero Member
Dec 6, 2016
267
21
marcher said:
addressing language requirements clause ... recycled argument.
actually he is right :-X c6 has some issues, language and terrorism let them transfer it to committee and amend it
 

marcher

Hero Member
Mar 30, 2016
534
61
monalisa said:
actually he is right :-X c6 has some issues, language and terrorism let them transfer it to committee and amend it
of course. it is impossible to pass C-6 as it is. and if liberals are waiting for cons to step up and amend it, then they are dreaming.
 

monalisa

Hero Member
Dec 6, 2016
267
21
marcher said:
now addressing the terrorist citizenship revocation clause .. same old argument again...
Dear they are absolutely right, let them introduce new bill for 3/5 and days before pr
 

admontreal

Hero Member
Feb 15, 2011
326
9
Montreal, QC
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
monalisa said:
actually he is right :-X c6 has some issues, language and terrorism let them transfer it to committee and amend it
I apologize, but he is not.
This bill will not be amended.
The Finance committee conservatives tried to amend the Tax cuts but the amendments were deemed irrelevant coming from non-elected senators and cancelled. No amendmemt not expected by the government will be accepted.
 

marcher

Hero Member
Mar 30, 2016
534
61
admontreal said:
I apologize, but he is not.
This bill will not be amended.
The Finance committee conservatives tried to amend the Tax cuts but the amendments were deemed irrelevant coming from non-elected senators and cancelled. No amendmemt not expected by the government will be accepted.
so it will have to be cancelled and redrafted under a new bill.