kuzey said:
1. If you wanna make sure that you gained 69 points you should have two eligibility review. The first one should be done close to the date that you got PER and the other one should be done after. More important you should have a note written by your officer in the last pages to confirm that you passed the eligibility.
2. Admissibility I think would be the last section to be updated.
3. In activities section check criminality, I submitted my documents on 11 May 2012 and my GCMS notes showed that they started my criminality right after they requested additional documents on Feb. 06. By the way, I think whether it is started or not has nothing to do with the admissibility.
4. After all, I hope you interpretation is correct.
Ya, make sure whether it's Sydney or Ottawa who had assessed your file (since it's on December, most likely it was from Ottawa, in which case, congratulations
. Also, bioleaching, if you don't mind, can you share the wording of the notes that awarded you 69 points?
The reason why you had not yet heard anything back from them was because your later due date. I would say you're lucky to have applied in June rather than, say, April or March, since some of these March or April applicants are still waiting to be assessed for selection factor
bioleaching said:
4. In Note section; last note was updated 18 March 2013 which labeled "Adm/" I do not know what that means: Hopefully "Admitted"
I think 'Adm' means that your admissibilities are under (or awaiting) review. This, in my opinion, is usually initiated after you have gained enough points. But then again, your eligibility also depends on your settlement funds, which was why eligibility is not yet 'passed', but still 'in progress', despite having more than 67 points.
kaziahmmed said:
Hi Asberath--- Congratulations man for ur success. I still have not get anything back from them after my document request (17th Jan,13), on March 20th they have sent me an e-mail that they have not received my documents which I already have sent in February 25th, 13. I was lucky that I have confirmed from them that they have received my documents just few days earlier before March 20th when they said they didn't receive my documents. I have forwarded that confirmation email and later they had apologized for the confusion. Lastly, they said they attached my documents with my file and it is in que. From then waiting and waiting with huge frustration. Do you have any suggestion man? Many thanks for your continuation still in the forum and sharing ur experience with us. Say hi to Tyrusx if you r in touch with him. ......Cheers! Kazi
Thanks, man
About your application, let's hope that they have at least passed your selection factor (number of points). Try ordering your CAIPS to see if this has indeed happened. bioleaching applied in June, and he already passed selection factor, so since you applied at around the same time, they have probably assessed your file as well, but since they cannot issue you visa earlier than March or April applicants, your file is awaiting for further processing (admissibilities).
N_O said:
I've calculated the total hours that she has worked to the present, according to the student stipend part, here what I did.
Code:
Sep. 1,2010 To Apr 30, 2011 16.95 hour/week $1250.00/month 16.95*34.5=584.78
May 1,2011 To May 30, 2011 16.62 hour/week $1250.00/month 16.62*04.3=071.5
June 1,2011 To Aug 31, 2011 21.00 hour/week $1580.00/month 21.00*13.0=273
Sep. 1,2011 To Apr 30, 2012 12.74 hour/week $0958.33/month 12.74*34.5=439.5
May 1,2012 To Nov 30, 2012 12.49 hour/week $0958.33/month 12.49*31.5=393.4
Dec. 1,2012 To Dec.31,2012 13.36 hour/week $1025.00/month 13.36*04.5=060
Jan. 1,2013 To Apr.30,2012 09.45 hour/week $0752.00/month 09.45*17.0=160.6
Total hours=1980
There is obviously the question of minimum wage. If the HR letter shows that she's making only 750 - 900 dollars per month, while working for 40 hours per week, then her hourly wage would be way below the minimum wage of 10.25 dollars per hour (in Ontario, not sure about other provinces). I'm not sure if this is going to be a problem, but it's probably best to claim less hours.
If you claim fewer hours than what's written on the HR letter, they wouldn't care too much, since they would just give you less number of points for work experience, so I like N_O's recalculation of the number of hours (since it also ensures it's above minimum wage). Rather than just showing average, though, I would still keep it term by term, or break it down for each period which has the same number of hours and the salary per month (like N_O has done here).
How many years of experience does she need though? If she only needs one year, then this breakdown is good. If she needs at least two years, then we would need to think of something else.
salam20 said:
Plz remember to to include the job name and duties that are similar to NOC
Ya, this is probably the most important part of the work experience letter. If you have job duties mismatch, they will probably not even care about your wage or number of hours, and go straight for rejection.
