Search results

This facebook style of supporting is really funny and pathetic.

I opened this thread because I think that one of the reasons for questioning about the specific dates is due to lack of knowledge from the person who is representing CIC about the date format from a specific country. I am talking about stamps which doesn't show the month with letters and stamps...

It means that the application is still in Sydney and some of the processing people just started working on it.

This week I will be eligible to apply too under the new rules and I also noticed that the end calculation from the online calculator is updated . Now it shows separately the calendar years with the days of physical presence in Canada.

I also hope that finally CIC will enter the new century by using e-mail notifications for the important events during the process.

I'm also eligible to apply this week under the new rules, but I am planning a long 5 month vacation starting from next week and I am concerned that they will call me for the test while I am abroad. For that reason I think that I might procrastinate my application until I come back later this year.

Very good catch screech339 ;)

The most important factor is how fast the processing person works on the file.

Cheers 8)

I noticed that some countries use numbers only to indicate the month of entry/exit and some countries use the opposite date formats. Sometimes the month is the first number but sometimes is the second number. Here is an example: Entry stamp: 01-07-2015. Would that create a confusion whether the...

I really hope that they will switch to e-mail correspondence with the applicants. I don't trust the regular mail for that kind of important communication.

CanadianCountry CIC must have solid evidences in order to deny an application ( Like prove of not declared trips or miscalculation from the applicant of the physical days) in these situations we have numbers and facts. It will be impossible for CIC to determine the real intention of a person...

It is not possible for a state structure (CIC) to measure the REAL intention. Intentions are not constant, they are changing during the lifeline and they know that pretty well. I didn't find any direct evidence in the law itself to consider this clause as a real danger for the final decision.

I don't have a problem with that new law. The funny thing according to me is that the people are giving far too much attention on something which is not dangerous in practice... I am talking about the Intend to reside Fake paranoia. This clause is just a symbolic attachment.

I really don't see how this intend to reside clause will be enforced efficiently. It is impossible to measure the validity of an intent based on a specific point in time.

US has another stupidity specially made for US citizens is that you will be taxed over your international income if you live outside of US. That was one of the main reasons why I voluntarily renounced my US citizenship. At least Canada doesn't follow them on that. And don't worry once you are...

The idea is that fake paranoia to be spread around. Everyday one and the same BS about that intend to reside clause.

US has very similar attitude toward the intend to reside as of when a person is still with a PR status there. I have been questioned few times when I was absent from US as a PR for around 4 months. The border guys have asked me why I was absent for so long. Am I going to continue residing in US...

Here I agree with you. In US I've also experienced how this stuff works against the innocent people in the everyday living situations.

Can you show where in the law is written that they will revoke your citizenship because of the intend BS.