Search results

Did anyone here face the experience that the VO note is not the fact happening in the interview. Despite the fact that my spouse used to be overstay in Canada and we have separated before, she didn’t use these reason to refuse our application. She refused by the reason that my spouse doesn’t...

As I know some other same sex application which get approval. The parents don't even know the spouse at all. I found out my parents were very traditional person, they cannot accept it. So I don't think to tell them about our relationship right now. Once they come to Canada, I will show them June...

I disclose him in my PR application. He was ready for the examination from CIC. But CIC didn't ask for the examination. If we were not separate during my application, I can definitely bring him to get the PR as long as he leave the Canada. Because once he back to China, he is no inadmissible...

I with my spouse. But she asked me some basic question and let me wait outside. I talked to my spouse about questions after interview right away. So both of us remember what happened. How she treat our additional document as junk in the interview. She asked me what is your job? I said my job is...

But the truth is she didn't ask the these questions but put it on the note. We have strong evidence to proof that we are not marriage of convenience in our file.

That's fine. We just want to be treated fair. I will consult my lawyer next week. I heard there has voice record. As an officer, you cannot review the case by your own preference.

We are same sex relationship. And both of us are Chinese.

I think she though we are fake relationship and after refusal we won't do anything. But we will fight for our bonafide relationship.

She must think that we won't go for appeal. If we don't go appeal, no one will review her notes.

Sure. I will do it after my work. I can share with all of you about what kind evidence we give. And the note she wrote was conflicted to the evidence there.

I am doing the comment on the GCMS note to mark what question she asked and what kind questions she didn't. And what was my spouse answer. Both of us has a good memory. We remembered.

I still can not believe that the office will lie on the note. I know most of you cannot believe. But the thing is actually happening right now.

A thousand percent sure about it or more than thousand percent.

I know. So we prepared very well about everything. But the truth is she never asked in the interview but put it on the note. That's make us feel angry.

Yes. But the fact is she never asked in the interview. When my spouse came out I asked him about it. She never asked and was struggling with our timeline. My spouse spend 1.5 hrs help her to organize the timeline.

She never asked these to my spouse. These question and answer is an example that how she wrote something never happened in the interview to the note. That's the reason I want to see whether we have chance to get a video or voice record to proof the office is a liar.

You get my point. The officer never asked these questions. But put it on the note and said my spouse cannot answer.

Hello The question is the office never asked this question to my spouse but she wrote on the file that she asked the question. And the answer is the office wrote as well. If she asked this question to my spouse, my spouse can definitely answer it. I think you didn't get my point. Half of note...

Hello Everyone: My spouse had the interview on April and it was refused. As sponsor, I have already submitted the appeal. I have received the GCMS note yesterday and found that at least half of the note was not truth. For example, the officer wrote that she asked my spouse that whether he know...

Hello: I noticed some of the interview convocation letter there is only principal applicant's name and some of has both the principal applicant and sponsor's name. Anyone know is there has any difference? Thanks