+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Country of Origin Police Certificate

antman88

Full Member
Feb 16, 2022
36
10
Hi all,

I applied for my Canadian citizenship 12 Dec 2021 and got my AOR this morning (16 Feb 2022). Soon after my AOR, I received an email requesting more information - specifically a PCC from India. My situation is as follows:

I became a landed PR Sept 2017 as a citizen of India, previously residing in India. In Sept 2018 I shifted back to India, and returned to Canada in July 2019 - being away for a total of ~309 days. In my application, I stated (Q.10b) that I had lived in another country (India) for more than 183 days. My understanding if that since I was in India, my country of origin, I would not need to provide a PCC. I mentioned this in my application, however, the email I receive today states:

"You must provide a police certificate for each country or territory where you have been present for 183 days or more in a row (since the age of 18). If you cannot get a police certificate, please explain why. A police certificate or explanation for no certificate is required for your time spent in India."

My questions are:

1. I'm not sure how to tackle this - do I state that I would not need a PCC since India is my country of origin? Or should I apply for the PCC via BLS anyway?
2. The email asks me to submit the requested information within 60 days from today, however the BLS website states that PCC can take a minimum of 8 weeks. Has anyone faced this issue? How does one overcome the time constraint here?

Thanks for your help!
 

wksj

Hero Member
Oct 7, 2021
424
594
I was about to ask why you are creating another thread, but turns out it was another person with a similar question, here: https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/received-request-for-police-certificate-post-citizenship-application-technically-not-needed.758083/

In your case, you clearly need to provide a police certificate because you left Canada and were in another country for more than 183 days in a row in the last 4 years AFTER becoming a PR, therefore exception does not apply to you.

You don’t need to provide a police certificate if
  • you were in your country of origin immediately prior to becoming a permanent resident and landing in Canada, and
  • this time falls within the past 4 years
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/application/application-forms-guides/guide-0002-application-canadian-citizenship-under-subsection-5-1-adults-18-years-older.html
 
Last edited:

walter_white

Hero Member
Aug 30, 2019
307
255
Hi all,

I applied for my Canadian citizenship 12 Dec 2021 and got my AOR this morning (16 Feb 2022). Soon after my AOR, I received an email requesting more information - specifically a PCC from India. My situation is as follows:

I became a landed PR Sept 2017 as a citizen of India, previously residing in India. In Sept 2018 I shifted back to India, and returned to Canada in July 2019 - being away for a total of ~309 days. In my application, I stated (Q.10b) that I had lived in another country (India) for more than 183 days. My understanding if that since I was in India, my country of origin, I would not need to provide a PCC. I mentioned this in my application, however, the email I receive today states:

"You must provide a police certificate for each country or territory where you have been present for 183 days or more in a row (since the age of 18). If you cannot get a police certificate, please explain why. A police certificate or explanation for no certificate is required for your time spent in India."

My questions are:

1. I'm not sure how to tackle this - do I state that I would not need a PCC since India is my country of origin? Or should I apply for the PCC via BLS anyway?
2. The email asks me to submit the requested information within 60 days from today, however the BLS website states that PCC can take a minimum of 8 weeks. Has anyone faced this issue? How does one overcome the time constraint here?

Thanks for your help!
Consider yourself lucky that your entire application was not returned but rather they asked you for additional document.
 

CaBeaver

Champion Member
Dec 15, 2018
2,941
1,369
I was about to ask why you are creating another thread, but turns out it was another person with a similar question, here: https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/received-request-for-police-certificate-post-citizenship-application-technically-not-needed.758083/

In your case, you clearly need to provide a police certificate because you left Canada and were in another country for more than 183 days in a row in the last 4 years AFTER becoming a PR, therefore exception does not apply to you.

You don’t need to provide a police certificate if
  • you were in your country of origin immediately prior to becoming a permanent resident and landing in Canada, and
  • this time falls within the past 4 years
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/application/application-forms-guides/guide-0002-application-canadian-citizenship-under-subsection-5-1-adults-18-years-older.html
If they ask for a PCC, all rules are out of the window.
 

antman88

Full Member
Feb 16, 2022
36
10
Thanks all! Going to scramble to get my PCC within the 60 day window now. Trying to find out if BLS Toronto is open for walk-in application drop-off.
 

Seym

Champion Member
Nov 6, 2017
1,715
838
It's not a problem if it takes more than 60 days btw. Just make sure to start the process soon, and if there are delays, let's IRCC know, provide a proof that you already made a request and ask for an extension. They understand that there are delays now :)
 

antman88

Full Member
Feb 16, 2022
36
10
It's not a problem if it takes more than 60 days btw. Just make sure to start the process soon, and if there are delays, let's IRCC know, provide a proof that you already made a request and ask for an extension. They understand that there are delays now :)
Thanks appreciate it. Already starting moving. Hoping to drop my application off by early next week so think it should be okay - as long as Toronto BLS is open for walk-in drop-offs and they give me some sort of receipt that I use to show that I've applied to get it.
 

ybjianada

Hero Member
Sep 6, 2015
449
132
Category........
Visa Office......
Singapore
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
20-01-2016
AOR Received.
20-01-2016
Med's Done....
Passed on 24-01-2016
Passport Req..
06-12-2016
VISA ISSUED...
23-12-2016
I was going to create another thread for my own question, but I might as well ask it just here.

My situation is somewhat similar to the OP's, having lived in another country for more than 183 days AFTER becoming a PR of Canada within the 4-year eligibility period. I knew from the get-go that I need a Police Certificate from my previous country of residence (Singapore). However, Singapore requires an official request letter from the requesting authorities, in order to apply for a Police Certificate.

Therefore, with my citizenship application, I submitted a letter explaining that 1) Yes, I need a Police Certificate from Singapore, 2) Because of the requirements from the Singaporean authorities, I need a request letter from IRCC in order to apply for this certificate, 3) I am waiting for such a letter from you.

My citizenship application was submitted early July, 2021, and my AOR was September 30, 2021. To this date, I have not received any communication or request letter from IRCC regarding the Police Certificate.

Can I assume that therefore, they have decided to waive this requirement for me?
 

CaBeaver

Champion Member
Dec 15, 2018
2,941
1,369
I was going to create another thread for my own question, but I might as well ask it just here.

My situation is somewhat similar to the OP's, having lived in another country for more than 183 days AFTER becoming a PR of Canada within the 4-year eligibility period. I knew from the get-go that I need a Police Certificate from my previous country of residence (Singapore). However, Singapore requires an official request letter from the requesting authorities, in order to apply for a Police Certificate.

Therefore, with my citizenship application, I submitted a letter explaining that 1) Yes, I need a Police Certificate from Singapore, 2) Because of the requirements from the Singaporean authorities, I need a request letter from IRCC in order to apply for this certificate, 3) I am waiting for such a letter from you.

My citizenship application was submitted early July, 2021, and my AOR was September 30, 2021. To this date, I have not received any communication or request letter from IRCC regarding the Police Certificate.

Can I assume that therefore, they have decided to waive this requirement for me?
I don't think so. They will contact you about this regard. It's a requirement.
 

ybjianada

Hero Member
Sep 6, 2015
449
132
Category........
Visa Office......
Singapore
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
20-01-2016
AOR Received.
20-01-2016
Med's Done....
Passed on 24-01-2016
Passport Req..
06-12-2016
VISA ISSUED...
23-12-2016
I don't think so. They will contact you about this regard. It's a requirement.
Then why was the OP contacted IMMEDIATELY after AOR about his/her police certificate, same with this guy:

https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/received-request-for-police-certificate-post-citizenship-application-technically-not-needed.758083/

Whereas, I have not heard a beep from them (about the certificate) for 4.5 months after my AOR?

Another example of inconsistency and unpredictability from IRCC?
 

CaBeaver

Champion Member
Dec 15, 2018
2,941
1,369
Then why was the OP contacted IMMEDIATELY after AOR about his/her police certificate, same with this guy:

https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/received-request-for-police-certificate-post-citizenship-application-technically-not-needed.758083/

Whereas, I have not heard a beep from them (about the certificate) for 4.5 months after my AOR?

Another example of inconsistency and unpredictability from IRCC?
Yeah, I guess it's inconsistency because there are no well-defined steps for each scenario, like not providing PCC with the application, that are followed across the board. Each officer decides on his/her own when to request it. I would be surprised if they don't ask you for one because you were obviously for 6+ months outside Canada after you landed, and the requirements dictates that you provide a PCC for that stay.
 

Qrios1

Star Member
Mar 27, 2015
60
41
Guys reading up on this has me stressed all over again. In our family scenario we returned to our country of birth after landing and activating our PR January 2017. Went back to settle affairs i.e. sell our family home, and all our belongings, resign from work so that we would have more settlement funds for the big permanent move back. By July 2017 I landed back in Canada, to look for work and find a place to stay. Thank God that went smoothly, I found a job in my field soon after landing, was able to get a place, a vehicle while my wife wrapped up things in the home country. Kids and wife came over Oct 2017. Fast forward to Oct 2020 three straight years in Canada not leaving at all we applied for citizenship as a family and submitted in Nov 2020. My wife received a request for PCC after AOR (Feb 2021). In the 10(b) section I indicated that we were in the home country before permanently settling back in Canada hence did not include a PCC for my wife (spending above 183 days outside of Canada after PR activation). For the reply back via email, I explained that to the IRCC officer but included my wife's original PCC back when we applied for PR (2016). Background was cleared in April 2021 and we received request for citizenship test in Nov 2021. Can I assume then that the officer has accepted our documentation and explanation, or else we wouldn't have progressed to the test? Thanks
 
Last edited:

dpenabill

VIP Member
Apr 2, 2010
6,435
3,182
OVERALL . . . for @ybjianada and @Qrios1 . . . there is no for-sure or even close to sure answer as to whether or not IRCC will make a request (or for @Qrios1 a further or additional request) for a PCC in order to complete processing your citizenship applications.

For @ybjianada in particular, it probably depends on how IRCC approaches Singapore PCCs generally. If typically IRCC expects applicants to go through the process of obtaining and submitting a Singapore PCC, odds are probably high a PCC will be requested. Note, trying to request the "letter" in the citizenship application was probably ineffective, unless the responsible processing agent in the local office acts on it, but that would not be likely unless and until the local office processing reached the stage where the PCC is requested anyway.

In the past the anecdotal reporting suggested IRCC often did not follow through with PCC requests even if the applicant's "explanation" for not including one was insufficient. But the anecdotal reporting more recently tends to indicate IRCC is increasingly requiring applicants to provide PCCs.

Regarding OP's Scenario:

Note: @wksj accurately responded to the OP's query. And @walter_white was mostly, but not entirely, spot on.

The OP got AOR rather than the application being returned because the OP met the requirements for submitting a complete application, by stating an explanation for why a PCC was not included. However, during the first stage screening it was obviously recognized that the OP's explanation for not including a PCC was not a valid reason (see @wksj's post), so the request for a PCC. And now it is likely the OP's application is stalled, waiting for the PCC before it is referred to the next step in processing.

This is not a common report. Far more often the request for a PCC comes much later in the process, typically after the application is in the local office, probably most often at the test/interview event (before covid-related procedures) or following the test.

This is most likely related to the nature of the initial screening of applications upon opening them at CPC-Sydney. That process is mostly going down a checklist to verify the questions are answered, including no gaps where relevant, and required documents included. It is mostly a completeness screening. It is mostly to determine whether there is sufficient information and documents to proceed with processing the application.

This has not, historically, involved screening the content of the application for accuracy. With some exceptions, like the proof of meeting the language requirement has long been screened to see that it is substantively sufficient, and the application is returned if the language proof is not a type that is acceptable proof. And for some time IRCC has been returning some applications from PRs who listed pre-PR time for periods during which their GCMS records did not confirm their TR status, their applications returned as incomplete on the basis the applications did not show the applicant to meet the physical presence requirement.

But, for example, for the applicant who checked "no" in response to item 10.b., that met the completeness criteria EVEN IF an analysis of the applicant's travel history would show the applicant should have checked "yes" and included a PCC (or explained why not). This would be, so to say, "caught" later on, and in many cases (but NOT all) result in a later request for a PCC . . . typically at or following the test. (Impact of erroneous "no" response is a separate credibility issue.)

Without tracking down all the instances in which it appears the completeness screening phase has increasingly incorporated some degree of checking the accuracy or validity of the content, prior to the OP's report it was unusual to see a PCC request soon following AOR.

In any event, the OP's "explanation" is one that can be easily identified as insufficient, as just the address or work history, in addition to the travel history, likely all pointed to the OP being in the other country after landing and within the relevant four years. And this being a common misunderstanding, about who has to submit a PCC with the application, there is a good chance this particular scenario has been added to the completeness screening checklist.

Leading to . . . .
My situation is somewhat similar to the OP's, having lived in another country for more than 183 days AFTER becoming a PR of Canada within the 4-year eligibility period. I knew from the get-go that I need a Police Certificate from my previous country of residence (Singapore). However, Singapore requires an official request letter from the requesting authorities, in order to apply for a Police Certificate.

Therefore, with my citizenship application, I submitted a letter explaining that 1) Yes, I need a Police Certificate from Singapore, 2) Because of the requirements from the Singaporean authorities, I need a request letter from IRCC in order to apply for this certificate, 3) I am waiting for such a letter from you.

My citizenship application was submitted early July, 2021, and my AOR was September 30, 2021. To this date, I have not received any communication or request letter from IRCC regarding the Police Certificate.

Can I assume that therefore, they have decided to waive this requirement for me?
I cannot guess whether IRCC will request a PCC from Singapore or how the particular circumstances for obtaining one from Singapore will affect the procedure if IRCC does make that request. Situation is particular enough to individuals there have been few anecdotal reports, let alone reliable ones, illuminating much about this.

While the anecdotal reporting related to this is too sporadic to make firm inferences, it appears to me that IRCC has been making the later request for a PCC more often than it did in the past.

Some clarification is needed however.

In particular, I am not sure what "requirement" you are asking about, just as I do not know for sure what ""requirement" @CaBeaver is referring to here:
I would be surprised if they don't ask you for one because you were obviously for 6+ months outside Canada after you landed, and the requirements dictates that you provide a PCC for that stay.
It appears to me that both of you are confusing what is required to make a complete application for citizenship with what IRCC can request later in processing an application that has passed the completeness screening. The only specific requirement regarding PCCs for a citizenship application is that to make a complete application applicants must disclose whether they were in another country for 183 days or more in a row during the four years preceding the application, and if they were (thus they check "yes" in response to question 10.b. (looking at CIT 0002 10-2020 version), the applicant is required to list the country, identify whether a PCC is submitted, and if a PCC is not being submitted to explain why not.

Thus, @ybjianada, if you checked yes for 10.b. and listed Singapore, checked "no" in regards to submitting a PCC, and included an explanation for this in the chart, you met the requirements for making a complete application.

There is thus NO requirement for you to submit a PCC . . . UNLESS IRCC specifically requests one. As I discuss above, the OP's report is unusual and signals the likelihood that IRCC has incorporated screening for this particular circumstance, resulting in a request for a PCC sooner rather than later. But because the OP stated an explanation, even though invalid that was enough to make it a complete application.

Once The Application Is In Process . . . the *REQUIREMENT* at stake is whether there are any criminal charges or convictions in the other country that would constitute a prohibition, and what IRCC might request as proof. The *REQUIREMENT* is to have no charges or convictions for an indictable offence within the four years preceding the application. Whether or not IRCC will require the applicant to provide further proof of no prohibitions during processing, such as a PCC, is a local office processing decision.

Actually no request for a PCC might not be good news. IRCC can alternatively make an overseas referral to investigate the applicant's background in the other country, and if that happens, to verify the applicant has no prohibitions arising from charges in that country, that can actually delay processing longer, and potentially a lot longer, than going through the process of obtaining a PCC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: antman88

Qrios1

Star Member
Mar 27, 2015
60
41
@dpenabill thank you for your detailed answers (as usual). This is very much appreciated, for the careful analysis and effort that go into providing useful commentary. We learn alot from such insight and other people in similar situations will also benefit. I will endeavour to post back here the outcome. This journey, like the PR process, is a very stressful period, but once that "golden ticket" comes, it will all be worth it!
 

dpenabill

VIP Member
Apr 2, 2010
6,435
3,182
what about the note that if you were in your country of origin before becoming a permanent resident and that falls in the 4 years period, you don't need to submit a police certificate?
yea i knew it existed but i submitted a police certificate anyway when i applied, cause i know they might do it.
Responding here where this subject is on-topic, to offer some clarification, rather than in the thread where posted where PCCs are at best a remote tangent.

This is not about whether @omarnabsws needed to submit a PCC. In regards to that approach taken, pre-emptively providing a PCC "anyway," it is worth noting I totally agree that is a good idea (if not too inconvenient) for any applicant who checks "yes" for question 10.b) even if they think the exception for country of origin applies.

I recognize MOST understand what is asked and required in regards to question 10.b) & providing a PCC. This includes providing a PCC with the application (if required pursuant to the instructions), as well as recognizing that EVEN IF a PCC is NOT required with the application (and even if one is included with the application), ANY applicant can be asked to submit a PCC (even if not in another country for 183 days or more).

But there is still enough confusion or misunderstanding about this and who should include a PCC with the application, it seems worth repeating some clarifications and reminders.


Some Clarifications and/or Reminders:

Much of this is not implicated by what is quoted above from the posts by either @KhalRef or @omarnabsws, but again is offered as clarification and a reminder.

Validity of PCC:

If the applicant needs to submit a PCC, either with the application or later, in response to a request for a PCC, the PCC should be an original AND also be EITHER one that was issued AFTER the last time the applicant was in that country, OR a PCC that was issued within the previous six months.

A clarifying nuance: it is readily apparent, from anecdotal reporting, this is NOT always strictly enforced. This is not to suggest it is OK, let alone a good idea, to test this. This is to caution that reports from applicants who say they submitted a copy or a PCC that was issued before their last time in that country, and for them it was OK, does NOT mean it will be OK for someone else. It might be. It might not be. As I often reiterate, if in doubt, follow the instructions; otherwise, yep, follow the instructions.​
Typical example: apart from who fits an exception, and does not need to provide a PCC, for those who still should submit a PCC for the country they were in prior to coming to Canada, it appears quite a few applicants submit a copy of the PCC they submitted with their PR visa application, EVEN if in addition to that not being an original, it is a PCC issued more than six months previously (obviously) and issued BEFORE the applicant's last time in that country. It appears that SOMETIMES this suffices. There is NO GUARANTEE, however, it will suffice.​


Potential Request for PCC During Processing:

As noted, even if a citizenship applicant is not required to submit a PCC with the application, as specified in the instructions, ANY applicant may be asked to provide a PCC later, during processing of the application. This does not appear to happen often UNLESS the applicant should have submitted a PCC but did not (such as in the OP's case, where the application was complete but the explanation was insufficient or not valid, so the OP received a request for a PCC following AOR).

BUT to be clear, IRCC can ask any applicant to provide a PCC . . . which practically could be for any country the applicant spent any time in during the preceding four years . . . and it could be way fewer than 183 days. There is NO sign this is common, however, and it appears to be NOT likely unless the amount of time in the other country is relatively close to six months.

Suggestion: any applicant confident they do not need to provide a PCC with the application, BUT who spent a lot of time in another country during the preceding four years, it is OK to make the application without submitting a PCC, BUT a good idea to initiate the process to obtain one to have to submit later if requested, to minimize potential delays if a PCC is requested. OR, as @omarnabsws did, simply pre-emptively include a PCC with the application.

NO Need to Submit PCC Versus How to Answer Question 10.b) :

I think it is important to clarify and remember that even if the prospective citizenship applicant positively concludes they do not need to submit a PCC, that has NO relevance in how they respond to the question in 10.b (looking at current and previous version of CIT 0002). The appropriate response to question 10.b is a simple fact: yes or no, was the applicant in another country for 183 or more days in a row during the four years preceding the date of the application.
Thus, for example, for a PR who never left Canada after landing, after arriving here, who elects to proceed with an application two or three months after reaching the three years presence threshold, and who was in their country of origin (or, actually, any other particular country) prior to coming here, they need to check "yes" they were in another country for 183 or more days in a row during the preceding four years, and then list that country, and they do not need to submit a PCC . . . so assuming they are not submitting a PCC, they need to state an "explanation" which can be a simple "was in country of origin before becoming a PR."​

In particular: if the prospective applicant was in another country for 183 or more days in a row within the four years preceding the date of the application for citizenship, the proper answer to question 10.b) is YES. Yes, because as a matter of fact the applicant was in another country for 183 or more days in a row . . . EVEN if the applicant otherwise confidently concludes they do not need to include a PCC with the application. A "yes" answer requires the applicant to list the country in the chart, and as of the 10-2020 version of CIT 0002 requires the applicant to indicate, yes or no, whether a PCC is being submitted, and if not, to provide an explanation . . . which can be either an explanation that a PCC cannot be obtained or reference to an applicable exception, such as the time in the other country was in the applicant's country of origin.

Leading to . . .

Country of Origin Exception and Example 1:

There is some uncertainty about how the "country of origin" exception works. For example, there is some question about whether "country of origin" means the individual's home country, that is their country of nationality, or means the country the individual was living in prior to obtaining status and coming to Canada.

It does not matter whether "country of origin" actually means home country or not IF since landing the applicant has NOT returned to the country they were in before becoming a PR AND they submitted a PCC for that country during the process of becoming a PR. This is "Example 1" (examples are currently only set out in the Guide, but were also included in a drop down in previous fillable pdf versions of CIT 0002, prior to the 10-2020 version).

It is worth noting that Example 1 is, more or less, an application of the general principle that a PCC suffices if the individual has not been in that country since the PCC was issued. The PCC submitted with the PR application is deemed sufficient . . . to be precise, typically the PR will have remained in that country, where they were living prior to getting a Canadian visa and coming to Canada to live, some period of time after the PCC was issued. So that PCC is not exactly one issued before the individual's last time in that country. Pretty obvious IRCC considers this close enough.

There is an open question about whether Example 1 is about or otherwise applies to the "note" in the application, which states:
"If you were in your country or territory of origin immediately prior to becoming a permanent resident and landing in Canada and this time falls within this four (4) year period, you are not required to provide a police certificate. Please indicate this in the explanation box."​

Either way, the "country of origin" ONLY applies if the six months spent in that country was BEFORE the PR landed and became a PR. This goes back to the OP's example. There is no doubt, if AFTER landing a PR returns to the home country for six months, and that time period is within the four years prior to applying for citizenship, a PCC should be included with the application. This appears to trip up more than a few applicants, and I agree the wording of the note in the application is at least awkward (reads like something I wrote), but again there is no doubt: the exception ONLY applies if the six months in the home country was BEFORE the PR landed.