FSW WORLDWIDE

[47thRonnin]

Well mate, if you bother to read, you will understand that these documents do not magically appear out of thin air, or are disclosed by IRCC spies. Someone goes to IRCC and in accordance with the ATIP act requests access to these documents. The date you see on the document is the system issue date, not the document date, and that's why it is somewhat is in a watermark form. And let me be clear, by the system issue date I mean that the date IRCC issued the document to the general public.

I can go request a document of 2018, and still, the issue date on the document will be of August 2021.

Again, if you bothered to read the document, you would see it is an internal document and not one “released to the public”.

You would have also seen that the link path in the document was from the Cic INTRANET with the corresponding date which is not part of the watermark.

Maybe you have not worked in an office before so you don’t know how these things work. I would rather keep my mouth shut as we are all in the dark than put out silly theories like you are doing. Shalom

 

[Khans96]

Amazing how some people come here and pull theories out of their bums. If you bothered to read the document referring to September, you would have seen it was dated 21/7/21. Maybe you should check your facts before posting unsubstantiated theories.

Just curious which document are you referring to?

 

[scylla]

Well mate, if you bother to read, you will understand that these documents do not magically appear out of thin air, or are disclosed by IRCC spies. Someone goes to IRCC and in accordance with the ATIP act requests access to these documents. The date you see on the document is the system issue date, not the document date, and that's why it is somewhat is in a watermark form. And let me be clear, by the system issue date I mean that the date IRCC issued the document to the general public.

I can go request a document of 2018, and still, the issue date on the document will be of August 2021.

That's not what happened here. It's an internal document.

Internal documents are sometimes leaked to the media. This isn't all that unusual here. It happens from time to time and there are various motives for doing this (usually political).

I know people who've been involved in this and have acted as the middle man between the MP leaking the info and the media. Totally happens.

 

[Psyoptica]

Well mate, if you bother to read, you will understand that these documents do not magically appear out of thin air, or are disclosed by IRCC spies. Someone goes to IRCC and in accordance with the ATIP act requests access to these documents. The date you see on the document is the system issue date, not the document date, and that's why it is somewhat is in a watermark form. And let me be clear, by the system issue date I mean that the date IRCC issued the document to the general public.

I can go request a document of 2018, and still, the issue date on the document will be of August 2021.

so how do you know these notes are from last year?

 

[Jaycejay]

so how do you know these notes are from last year?

He’s clueless, trust me

 

[Skey]

so how do you know these notes are from last year?

He’s clueless, trust me

HAHAHA True. Make most logical sense this way. September and December grouping is illogical considering the 2021 announcements.

 

[Jaycejay]

HAHAHA True. Make most logical sense this way. September and December grouping is illogical considering the 2021 announcements.

 

[EscoBlades]

It seems they are almost done with non-complex CEC applications received in 2020. Last updated processing timeline status said they are working on December 2020. Good to also see they’re giving COPR to outland dependents

I’m non complex, August 2020, and not a peep. They aren’t following any clear process for processing beyond rushing through 2021 AORs to keep their service standard average down.

 

[Jaycejay]

I’m non complex, August 2020, and not a peep. They aren’t following any clear process for processing beyond rushing through 2021 AORs to keep their service standard average down.

For real? I might have to attach less importance to those processing timelines then

 

[Skey]

I’m non complex, August 2020, and not a peep. They aren’t following any clear process for processing beyond rushing through 2021 AORs to keep their service standard average down.

No doubt mate, it's just plain wrong. We FSW Outland can understand somewhat of an illogical reason. But not giving Aug 2020 CEC people is just plain unfair.

 

[EscoBlades]

For real? I might have to attach less importance to those processing timelines then

Yeah those dates they put on the website are simply lip service. Lots of July and August 2020 AORs still waiting, mostly for Security to even start. Both the VOs in Ottawa still aren’t at full in person capacity.

 

[47thRonnin]

Just curious which document are you referring to?

A document posted by Legal Falcon on his Facebook page. It’s an internal CIC document which talks about how to proceed with various application categories.

 

[Timbuktu_14]

For real? I might have to attach less importance to those processing timelines then

Yes he is. It seems that Ottawa office is the problem.

 

[Jaycejay]

Yes he is. It seems that Ottawa office is the problem.

I’m actually surprised @EscoBlades application is still in progress. Usually, security doesn’t take time for CEC-inland. Only IRCC knows

 

[Timbuktu_14]

I’m actually surprised @EscoBlades application is still in progress. Usually, security doesn’t take time for CEC-inland. Only IRCC knows

Ottawa seems to be the problem. Like @EscoBlades said, they aren't working at full capacity yet so many files are waiting for that security.