IELTS - Writing - For Band 7 or Above.
- Thread starter H0peAndFa1th
- Start date
Congrats about writing7! - What was the rest of the scores?I got my IELTS score today scored 7 in writing but failed in listening.overall 7.
First attempt.
Listening and reading can be improved by practice - Special attention for spelling, plural, verb or noun. You will make it ! all the best.
Hi,
Can someone please review and provide your suggestions. I will be really grateful. Thanks in advance
Some people believe that it is good idea to share as much info as possible in scientific research, business or academic world, other believe that some information is too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is considered by some that sharing knowledge in fields like research, business and academic is beneficial, while others thinks that some facts are crucial and thus needs to be preserved rather than transmitted. I am both fascinated by the positive impact of disseminating information and apprehensive about it negative impact as well.
On one hand, there are obvious benefits attached to sharing information. This helps in enhancing awareness and promoting development in the society. If the facts are distributed freely, this will enable individuals to capitalise the opportunity to bring radical changes by innovation and inventions. Individual at all levels should take initiative to educate people around them. A prime example is, successful business entrepreneurs talking about their success stories and hurdles they faced while climbing the ladder of growth. Indeed these experiences motivate the budding proprietors to face challenges in their way. It is therefore agreed that providing valuable sources to others not only aid the development of the organisation but also create positive impact on the worldwide economy.
On the other hand, I agree with people who believe that access to critical information should be confined to limited number of people. It is true that some facts are intrinsic to the organisation and sharing them might deter the privacy and security of the company. For instance, details about CEOs abrupt resignation from the board might create a ruckus if the matter is not conveyed properly. It is therefore necessary that certain facts should be handled by assigned individuals only. Various colleges, organisations have different ways of preserving intrinsic facts and this need to be adhered.
In conclusion, distributing information will lead to new inventions but the consequences of revealing crucial facts should not be ignored. Therefore, the management should decide carefully as to what needs to be trickled down to masses
Can someone please review and provide your suggestions. I will be really grateful. Thanks in advance
Some people believe that it is good idea to share as much info as possible in scientific research, business or academic world, other believe that some information is too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is considered by some that sharing knowledge in fields like research, business and academic is beneficial, while others thinks that some facts are crucial and thus needs to be preserved rather than transmitted. I am both fascinated by the positive impact of disseminating information and apprehensive about it negative impact as well.
On one hand, there are obvious benefits attached to sharing information. This helps in enhancing awareness and promoting development in the society. If the facts are distributed freely, this will enable individuals to capitalise the opportunity to bring radical changes by innovation and inventions. Individual at all levels should take initiative to educate people around them. A prime example is, successful business entrepreneurs talking about their success stories and hurdles they faced while climbing the ladder of growth. Indeed these experiences motivate the budding proprietors to face challenges in their way. It is therefore agreed that providing valuable sources to others not only aid the development of the organisation but also create positive impact on the worldwide economy.
On the other hand, I agree with people who believe that access to critical information should be confined to limited number of people. It is true that some facts are intrinsic to the organisation and sharing them might deter the privacy and security of the company. For instance, details about CEOs abrupt resignation from the board might create a ruckus if the matter is not conveyed properly. It is therefore necessary that certain facts should be handled by assigned individuals only. Various colleges, organisations have different ways of preserving intrinsic facts and this need to be adhered.
In conclusion, distributing information will lead to new inventions but the consequences of revealing crucial facts should not be ignored. Therefore, the management should decide carefully as to what needs to be trickled down to masses
I took my first IELTS-G test on May 11 and got a score of L8.5 / R9 / W6.5 / S6.5, enough to enter the pool but not enough to get an ITA.
I feel quite unhappy with the speaking part as I was expecting 7+. For the writing part I did screw up as I didn’t practice enough and also didn’t sleep well. I am considering remarking but the chance of getting a 7 in writing is too little...
I feel quite unhappy with the speaking part as I was expecting 7+. For the writing part I did screw up as I didn’t practice enough and also didn’t sleep well. I am considering remarking but the chance of getting a 7 in writing is too little...
Over all 7? Failed means? how much you scored?I got my IELTS score today scored 7 in writing but failed in listening.
First attempt.
This is very common to get a 7 in writing when you have lesser in any other skill, and you are not meeting CLB 9.
I wrote failed as in failed to get 8777.. that is required for getting high CRS score.
Dont understand what you are saying in second sentence...
Can someone kindly review the esaes and let me know the fallouts pleaseHi,
Can someone please review and provide your suggestions. I will be really grateful. Thanks in advance
Some people believe that it is good idea to share as much info as possible in scientific research, business or academic world, other believe that some information is too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is considered by some that sharing knowledge in fields like research, business and academic is beneficial, while others thinks that some facts are crucial and thus needs to be preserved rather than transmitted. I am both fascinated by the positive impact of disseminating information and apprehensive about it negative impact as well.
On one hand, there are obvious benefits attached to sharing information. This helps in enhancing awareness and promoting development in the society. If the facts are distributed freely, this will enable individuals to capitalise the opportunity to bring radical changes by innovation and inventions. Individual at all levels should take initiative to educate people around them. A prime example is, successful business entrepreneurs talking about their success stories and hurdles they faced while climbing the ladder of growth. Indeed these experiences motivate the budding proprietors to face challenges in their way. It is therefore agreed that providing valuable sources to others not only aid the development of the organisation but also create positive impact on the worldwide economy.
On the other hand, I agree with people who believe that access to critical information should be confined to limited number of people. It is true that some facts are intrinsic to the organisation and sharing them might deter the privacy and security of the company. For instance, details about CEOs abrupt resignation from the board might create a ruckus if the matter is not conveyed properly. It is therefore necessary that certain facts should be handled by assigned individuals only. Various colleges, organisations have different ways of preserving intrinsic facts and this need to be adhered.
In conclusion, distributing information will lead to new inventions but the consequences of revealing crucial facts should not be ignored. Therefore, the management should decide carefully as to what needs to be trickled down to masses
Equating computers with machine was the first give away of lacking vocabulary... computers ~ technology.
Overall i would recommend first make improvements in idea formation and then work on vocabulary.
Work on idea generation... Also understand the topic ... IDEAS don't equate with FACTS...Hi,
Can someone please review and provide your suggestions. I will be really grateful. Thanks in advance
Some people believe that it is good idea to share as much info as possible in scientific research, business or academic world, other believe that some information is too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is considered by some that sharing knowledge in fields like research, business and academic is beneficial, while others thinks that some facts are crucial and thus needs to be preserved rather than transmitted. (why crucial facts needs to be preserved? ... also preserved and transmitted are medical terms, kind of out context to use here) I am both fascinated by the positive impact of disseminating information and apprehensive about it negative impact as well. (where is your opinion statement, in body paragraph u agree with one side in paragraph 2 so why make above statement)
On one hand, there are obvious benefits attached to sharing information. This helps in enhancing awareness and promoting development in the society. If the facts ideas are distributed freely, this they will enable individuals to capitalise the opportunity to bring radical changes in the society by innovation and inventions.(society was the talking point suddenly you moved in to talking about business) Individual at all levels should take initiative to educate people around them. A prime example is, successful business entrepreneurs talking about their success stories and hurdles they faced while climbing the ladder of growth. Indeed these experiences motivate the budding proprietors to face challenges in their way. It is therefore agreed that providing valuable sources to others not only aid the development of the organisation but also create positive impact on the worldwide economy. Jump from society to organisation to worldwide economy without properly interlinking them, implied ideas are scattered.
On the other hand, I agree with people who believe that access to critical information should be confined to limited number of people.(who decides, limited is calculated adjective) It is true that some facts are intrinsic to the organisation and sharing them might deter the privacy and security of the company. For instance, details about CEOs abrupt resignation from the board might create a ruckus if the matter is not conveyed properly. It is therefore necessary that certain facts should be handled by assigned individuals only. Various colleges, organisations have different ways of preserving intrinsic facts and this need to be adhered.
In conclusion, distributing information will lead to new inventions but the consequences of revealing crucial facts should not be ignored. Therefore, the management should decide carefully as to what needs to be trickled down to masses
Sharing ideas would lead to inventions was the only relevant takeaway. and think what sharing scientific ideas can do...first one terrorists getting access to making weapons...
oh, man! so sorry to hear it.I got my IELTS score today scored 7 in writing but failed in listening.
First attempt.
This is new to me. if we write one adv/disadv, then are we supposed to write one problem and solution, even though the prompt uses plural?! Can anyone with experience of getting good bands with this approach confirm it?? It would be a great help since it gets hard to write 4 ideas and keep a check on word count as well!I agree.
Never seen anyone asking to write more than one advantage and disadvantage. You will also expect to elaborate on the ideas, fully developed ones, supported by an example. This will take at least 350 words or more, and I don't want to do this.
I Agree, this could have been better,
Thanks for evaluation @basharat01.
Personal opinion: This thread is a good source to learn, but I believe, we should not rely on the essay evaluation on such forums, though it is good to develop the writing skills by learning from the mistakes of others. But, when your essays are evaluated by multiple evaluators you are left confused which section to focus most. I don't mean to criticize anyone as I have learned a lot here, especially from @H0peAndFa1th and @cansha, but their availability is also limited. I am looking to take writing correction service, one thing for sure is I will always keep "The List" in mind, while writing.
Anyone?