I am NOT an expert. I have only gotten involved in this subject because, to a significant extent, no one else was stepping up to the plate and the consequences can indeed be very severe, so I was compelled to raise awareness of the issue . . . and because this is so important, such a dangerous pitfall, I have continued to follow the issue and offer what information and insight I can . . . but I actually am NOT all that familiar with refugee issues generally (I've had a life of relative privilege) and there is a lot of angles I know rather little about.
Sorry I cannot offer much to alleviate your anxiety. Yeah, I am afraid the interviewer's comment and attitude about obtaining a record of movement from your home country could be telling. As I observed in my previous post:
Given the potential cessation issue I am NOT sure how you should respond to a request for a record of movement from your home country . . . asking your home country for a record of movement, well that sounds more than a bit like being in a transactional relationship with the home country akin to reavailment.
This really is an issue for a lawyer. In some cities there are local organizations which provide services to refugees. I'd suggest researching for such organizations in your area and seeing if they can offer any help, assistance, advice, or referrals.
How much you are at risk depends on many factors, not the least of which is how often you have traveled using the home country passport, and especially how often you have traveled to the home country, how long you have stayed in the home country, WHY you have gone to and stayed there, and the nature of your activities in the home country (employment, for example, or business related activity, can increase the risk a lot).
In previous pages I and others cite and link some of the cessation cases. You may find some of that information helpful in evaluating the risks in your own situation.
If you have frequently traveled to the home country, and especially if you have stayed there for significant periods of time, you may want to really dig deep looking for ways to afford a lawyer.
Sorry I do not have better news. Unfortunately this is an issue which can result in someone who has been well-settled in Canada, PERMANENTLY settled in Canada, losing all status to live in Canada even though they have not done anything wrong.
As difficult as this may be, I hope you will report back here about how things actually go. As you might note per the recent query from
@Kamite and
@Sambu2019, and responses, there is a lot we do not know about current policy and practices. What you report can help us better inform others.
Note to @Sambu2019 -- the report from
@Kambs16 suggests this refugee-applicant's travel history did not trigger a cessation referral right away, that apparently it was identified in preparation for the test/interview and then addressed in the interview. This could suggest withdrawing the application MIGHT help avoid screening for and identification of a reavailment issue. Something to consider DEPENDING on your personal situation, including the nature and extent of your home country interactions, especially relative to frequency, purpose, and duration of stays in the home country.
The conflicting incentives include recognizing that once Canadian citizenship is obtained, travel to the home country would have NO significance (except for the risk to personal safety that might involve . . . but just being a Canadian citizen can significantly decrease such risks). So to withdraw the citizenship application, delaying Canadian citizenship, will preclude travel to the home country for the foreseeable future.
If you withdraw, it will still be prudent to NOT travel again using a home country passport . . . and indeed, NOT use the home country passport again for any reason. NOT renew or otherwise obtain another passport. And wait to apply again for citizenship; wait until there has been BOTH no travel to the home country within the preceding five years, and any home country passport has been expired for at least the full five years. Or until there is a change in the law regarding cessation (noting, however, there has been NO movement at all in this regard; Kwan's private member's bill going nowhere for example).
Generally I discourage relying much on anecdotal reports, except to the extent the report seems reliable and suggests what MIGHT happen (individual reports should NEVER be relied upon as proof of what the rule is or what will for sure happen), and can otherwise help us put various aspects of how things work in perspective.
BUT the
what-might-happen suggestion in the report by
@Kambs16 at the least indicates a possible if not probable window of opportunity to avoid the screening which could result in a cessation investigation referral . . . which if you have had frequent or lengthy trips to the home country, is something you might seriously consider doing.
And, for any other PR-refugee who has obtained a home country passport: best to stop using it. Remember that PoE examinations are the most common events triggering a cessation investigation.
And of course the greater the risks to personal safety you face in the home country, the more important it is to exercise caution to protect your PR-refugee status in Canada. At least until you become a Canadian citizen.
Protect yourselves!