HI Cansha,
In the first para, You mentioned u
Hi Cansha,
As you identified some issues of low value sentences in the first para.. I had written first few lines to introduce my idea. So that reader can know why my point in important.
Secondly, I dint go beyond easy dissemination of information because that will digress from the main topic, which is about new happenings in 1st century. if I had explained how it will impact geopolitical than it would have taken the discussion in some other direciton. that was my perception during writing this para and I dont know what went wrong.
However, it looks like the more I am writing the more I am struggling to write better, rather I am degrading. Isnt ?
Rg,
Moeed
In the first para, You mentioned u
Okay I reviewed the essay and again had to come back to say this. I understand this is a tough topic. Very tough and different from traditional topics we see here. My suggestion would be that when you are trying to write a new essay type do not time yourself and try to write an essay in 30-35 minutes. Give yourself time to make sure you understand what is needed.
I was happy to see the introduction till Geo-polictical and lifestyle of people. What happened after that? I can't see how the next line is an extension of previous line. What's the relationship?
Doesn't your second line say what is expected in this century? And then you go to two more topics. Okay fine. Let's go ahead and see where it goes.
This is probably the weakest paragraph I have seen from you. You can write much better. You have written much better before!
This para is better than previous one BUT still has similar issues. But still the message is consistent. It is very weak on establishing how it will be different from previous century besides one line on "effective utilization"
The essay doesn't establish anything about dilution of power and new way of living. This is not at the same level as your own previous essays.
I think forget about this essay. Sometimes its just as bad day. Or may be I'm being unjust to the essay. And I'm sorry if that is true.
Wish you all the best!
Okay I reviewed the essay and again had to come back to say this. I understand this is a tough topic. Very tough and different from traditional topics we see here. My suggestion would be that when you are trying to write a new essay type do not time yourself and try to write an essay in 30-35 minutes. Give yourself time to make sure you understand what is needed.
I was happy to see the introduction till Geo-polictical and lifestyle of people. What happened after that? I can't see how the next line is an extension of previous line. What's the relationship?
Doesn't your second line say what is expected in this century? And then you go to two more topics. Okay fine. Let's go ahead and see where it goes.
This is probably the weakest paragraph I have seen from you. You can write much better. You have written much better before!
This para is better than previous one BUT still has similar issues. But still the message is consistent. It is very weak on establishing how it will be different from previous century besides one line on "effective utilization"
The essay doesn't establish anything about dilution of power and new way of living. This is not at the same level as your own previous essays.
I think forget about this essay. Sometimes its just as bad day. Or may be I'm being unjust to the essay. And I'm sorry if that is true.
Wish you all the best!
Hi Cansha,
As you identified some issues of low value sentences in the first para.. I had written first few lines to introduce my idea. So that reader can know why my point in important.
Secondly, I dint go beyond easy dissemination of information because that will digress from the main topic, which is about new happenings in 1st century. if I had explained how it will impact geopolitical than it would have taken the discussion in some other direciton. that was my perception during writing this para and I dont know what went wrong.
However, it looks like the more I am writing the more I am struggling to write better, rather I am degrading. Isnt ?
Rg,
Moeed