Disavow portion of Citizenship oath
- Thread starter jbourne
- Start date
Even if my answer comes a bit late, it might open your eyes. With Queen Victoria’s death, in 1901, the repeal of Section 2 of the BNA Act came into force, deliberately leaving the Dominion of Canada without a Monarch. To this day the BNA Act repeal of Section 2 has never been re-enacted and the only Monarch it applies to is Queen Victoria. The section 2 stated: "The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. " When Queen Victoria died in 1901, nothing empowered the so-called "heirs and successors" to be a sovereign of Canada. Anyways, the whole Canada country and its constitution is a big lie, continuing in perpetuity, due to woke people, who don't even care what is happening on this landmass called Canada.
Deep research has unearthed key events, which have both created and hidden the truth of the myth that is Canada.
Event: From the 1700s into the next century, England and France were tense partners representing both Upper and Lower Canada.
General Wolfe’s death in the final battle on the Plains of Abraham in 1759, secured victory for England, the prize ultimately known as, ‘Canada’.
The Treaty of Paris joined the formerly British controlled Upper Canada with France’s Lower Canada into the French legal entity – a Corporation Sole, the ‘Province of Quebec’.
The amalgamation process from 1759 through 1763 seated the first British Governor General within that Corporation Sole, which in 1787 amalgamated all of ‘Canada’ enabling Britain to seat a Governor General to rule over the their Colonies known then as: the ‘Province of Canada’ and New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.
For 80 years between 1787 and 1867, the British placed many Governors General into the Corporation Sole. Issuing Letters Patent, the British Monarchy thereby proclaimed that Governor Generals held the ‘power’ to create and control the government of Canada, as a British Colony.
Event: Delegates from Canada had no part in drafting the British North America Act, March 29, 1867, and no certified copy of this act was brought back to to Canada by the delegates.
The Act was drafted by Lord Thring, Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury.
It is not a Constitution for it constitutes nothing.
It simply emphasizes the power of the Governor-General to appoint and remove a Privy Council to ‘aid and advise’ him and to state that the Governor-General has the power to pass an ‘order-in-council’ by himself individually as the case requires. ( An ‘order-in-council’ is equal to an Act of Parliament.)
One score and two years later the Interpretations Act, 1889, was passed, stating that Canada is a Colony. This gives the lie to the story of Confederation and brands it as a reductio ad absurdum.
Another recent absurdity is that a House and Senate of British Subjects debating the adoption of a Flag and Anthem.
You say you have never heard of this before! You are not alone in this.
The ‘Dominion of Canada’ meant the British Empire would retain their prize, the Governor General was then able to control all of Canada.
John A. MacDonald, knighted as Sir John A., was ultimately a traitor to the people he represented in Canada. Joining the British mainland colonies, they created the Dominion – Canada East, now Quebec; Canada West, now Ontario; along with New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.
Event: The year, 1868. Through their Royal Charter established in 1670 by King Charles 2nd, the privately held Hudson’s Bay Company employed land usage west of Quebec and Ontario, then known as Rupert’s Land.
In 1868, British Parliament created the ‘Rupert’s Land Act’ to allow the Hudson’s Bay Company to sell use-of-land back to the Monarch, Queen Victoria. The following year, Hudson’s Bay Company finalized the transaction by signing the “Deed of Surrender”. In 1871 Queen Victoria transferred the use of those lands to the ‘Dominion of Canada’, operated by the Governor General to settle the land and create the western provinces, the allodial title would be held by the Court in Chancery for the British Empire until 1931.
Event: The year, 1901. With Queen Victoria’s death, the repeal of Section 2 of the BNA Act came into force, deliberately leaving the Dominion of Canada without a Monarch. To this day the BNA Act repeal of Section 2 has never been re-enacted and the only Monarch it applies to is Queen Victoria.
Event: The year, 1931. British Parliament passed the ‘Statute of Westminster’ allowing their Dominions to act independently. This would allow the said Dominions to federate and create their own Constitutions.
Ireland, New Zealand, South Africa did – Canada did not.
Why didn’t Canada federate?
What does it really mean for us as “Canadians” today?
Follow the money… to learn how certain forces active even today, were determined not to surrender their cherished positions of power. Continuing by way of deception, these forces kept alive the illusion of ‘Canadian Confederation’ and ‘Sovereignty’. This deliberate illusion continued throughout various iterations of the BNA Act, later called the “Constitution Acts” of 1940, 43, 49, 60, 65, 74, 75 and finally, 1982.
Event: The year, 1946. King George VI appointed a Governor General to Canada. In 1947, he commanded the Parliament of Canada to create a
commission to write Letters Patent for his Governor General, he then commanded Prime Minister Mackenzie King to sign the new “Letters Patent” on his behalf. The letters patent reference the BNA act, 1867 “Letters Patent” enabling the GG to give Royal assent to the Income Tax act 1948.
The Governor General sits in Ottawa and his Lieutenant Governors sit in each of the provinces – to report not to you the people, but to the “Queen in Right of Canada”. Today some statutes created by the various provincial governments or the Federal government receive royal accent, the positions of Lt. Gov., GG and Queen of Canada are simply fictional figureheads with NO standing in law.
Event: 1952 the Royal Styles and Titles act is created by the Parliament of Canada for the Queen of Canada, yes that’s correct the Queen of Canada proclaims through this act, to be the Queen of Canada, not joking.
This should clear up any wonder over why at the inauguration ceremony of 2019, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and all elected members swore allegiance – hand-upon-Bible – to the Queen of Canada and not to the People of Canada. You may now have realized why.
But wait, how does this work… according to the Statutes Law Revisions Act of 1893, Section 2 of the BNA act, 1867 was repealed, so what Queen?
It’s time to discover the far-reaching impact against all of us!
Event: The year, 1982. To prevent people from discovering the illusion, Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau and his Cabinet created the ‘Canada Bill’, delivering directly to the self-styled ‘Queen of Canada’, Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, for her delivery of it to the British Parliament to thereby pass it as the “Canada Act”, 1982.
Trudeau would “patriate” the defunct BNA act 1867, to Canada – a photocopy, the original still residing in the UK Parliamentary Archives.
Upon returning, Trudeau convinced all provinces to ratify the deception of the new ‘Constitution’. This was of the utmost of importance, without the provinces ratifying this Act of a foreign parliament it could not become Supreme Law (Law of the Sea) here on the landmass commonly known as Canada. All the provinces with the exception of Quebec signed off. Their problem, the Constitution Act was NOT ratified and has NO standing here on the landmass commonly known as Canada.
The outcome of this adventure saw Trudeau retiring from politics, leaving his mess behind to be sorted out by future politicians.
To ensure the deception was laid to rest, the “Government of Canada” knew they needed to amend ‘The Constitution Act, 1982’. There was the Meech Lake Accord of 1987, followed five years later by the Charlottetown Accord. These accords failed and the “Government of Canada” did not get what it wanted.
As both Accords failed, the federal authority in 1995 let sleeping dogs lie, pretending everything was as it should be. After all, the people of Canada had yet to figure it out.
The Interpretation Act 1985 (R.S.C., 1985, c. I-21): defines “Canada” as: “for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada;”. This is clear admission and indication that the Canada corporation is only considered to be a body of water of the sea jurisdiction. This is also clear indication that Canada does not exist on the Land and has no claim to it. How did we get to this?
Today, Canada is not a lawfully established Sovereign Nation and it’s people are Sovereigns!
The land of Canada was never constituted into a proper de-jure government, and the people of the land of Canada remain Indigenous and Anglo/Saxon/English descendant Sovereigns and without a properly constituted country, a constitution (aside from the common Law of the land case law which serves as the “constitution”) and government of their own. The geographical area commonly referred to as “Canada” in reality is a Common Law, Free and virgin landmass that is unfortunately pestering with various service corporations that have improperly spilled out of their sea (jurisdiction) and have unlawfully encroached into the land while using unlawful conversion, misidentification and deceit to trick free Men into acting as their employees and officers. Deceit, fraud, misrepresentation and coercion are among multiple factors that immediately vitiate any contract and Canadian Nationals are free from any such contractual obligations with these service corporations.
There are millions of people in Canada knowing the above truth, but still nobody does anything. Canada is the only country in the world, recognized to have a Constitution problem and the politicians continue to avoid it, as they are not capable to rectify something which is not in their best interest.
But wait, how does this work… according to the Statutes Law Revisions Act of 1893, Section 2 of the BNA act, 1867 was repealed, so what Queen?
It’s time to discover the far-reaching impact against all of us!
Event: The year, 1982. To prevent people from discovering the illusion, Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau and his Cabinet created the ‘Canada Bill’, delivering directly to the self-styled ‘Queen of Canada’, Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, for her delivery of it to the British Parliament to thereby pass it as the “Canada Act”, 1982.
Trudeau would “patriate” the defunct BNA act 1867, to Canada – a photocopy, the original still residing in the UK Parliamentary Archives.
Upon returning, Trudeau convinced all provinces to ratify the deception of the new ‘Constitution’. This was of the utmost of importance, without the provinces ratifying this Act of a foreign parliament it could not become Supreme Law (Law of the Sea) here on the landmass commonly known as Canada. All the provinces with the exception of Quebec signed off. Their problem, the Constitution Act was NOT ratified and has NO standing here on the landmass commonly known as Canada.
The outcome of this adventure saw Trudeau retiring from politics, leaving his mess behind to be sorted out by future politicians.
To ensure the deception was laid to rest, the “Government of Canada” knew they needed to amend ‘The Constitution Act, 1982’. There was the Meech Lake Accord of 1987, followed five years later by the Charlottetown Accord. These accords failed and the “Government of Canada” did not get what it wanted.
As both Accords failed, the federal authority in 1995 let sleeping dogs lie, pretending everything was as it should be. After all, the people of Canada had yet to figure it out.
The Interpretation Act 1985 (R.S.C., 1985, c. I-21): defines “Canada” as: “for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada;”. This is clear admission and indication that the Canada corporation is only considered to be a body of water of the sea jurisdiction. This is also clear indication that Canada does not exist on the Land and has no claim to it. How did we get to this?
Today, Canada is not a lawfully established Sovereign Nation and it’s people are Sovereigns!
The land of Canada was never constituted into a proper de-jure government, and the people of the land of Canada remain Indigenous and Anglo/Saxon/English descendant Sovereigns and without a properly constituted country, a constitution (aside from the common Law of the land case law which serves as the “constitution”) and government of their own. The geographical area commonly referred to as “Canada” in reality is a Common Law, Free and virgin landmass that is unfortunately pestering with various service corporations that have improperly spilled out of their sea (jurisdiction) and have unlawfully encroached into the land while using unlawful conversion, misidentification and deceit to trick free Men into acting as their employees and officers. Deceit, fraud, misrepresentation and coercion are among multiple factors that immediately vitiate any contract and Canadian Nationals are free from any such contractual obligations with these service corporations.
There are millions of people in Canada knowing the above truth, but still nobody does anything. Canada is the only country in the world, recognized to have a Constitution problem and the politicians continue to avoid it, as they are not capable to rectify something which is not in their best interest.
what would be the result of making a statement to the clerk (before the actual oath), that you will be swearing allegiance to the monarch under protest, as there is no other legal option available at present. They surely cannot deny citizenship as you will be fulfilling their administrative criteria, but at least one’s objection may be noted.
An alternative would be for an entire oath cohort to refuse to swear allegiance. It would be politically scandalous for them to deny citizenship. However most new citizens are either afraid, or brainwashed into believing that there is no legal or moral consequence.
Perhaps it would be better to pledge allegiance to the Canadian people instead of a monarch.
An alternative would be for an entire oath cohort to refuse to swear allegiance. It would be politically scandalous for them to deny citizenship. However most new citizens are either afraid, or brainwashed into believing that there is no legal or moral consequence.
Perhaps it would be better to pledge allegiance to the Canadian people instead of a monarch.
Last edited:
There’s no need to be terse if you don’t agree. As to whether or not it would be noted, it may nevertheless permit one to make an oath with a clearer conscience. Oaths aren’t simply meaningless words- otherwise they would be optional. They have legal and moral consequences and some people of faith may not be able to swear allegiance to any monarch, and would prefer to pledge to the Canadian people instead.
You asked a question: what would be the result - and I answered. What problem do you have with that?
An Oath is an extremely powerful action, which can have tremendous consequences.
For example, the Oath is the one which empowers to judges to have the ability to judge. The 1953 Coronation Oath is a direct contract with queens subjects, and so on. Overall, the Oath is the one who gives power or oblige somebody to do something. There are a lot of people who disavowed and it's not a shame in that. I did it and I'm proud. How to sear allegiance to a family of anything, but moral people, family which enforced slavery for centuries, family full of incestuous marriages, a family which is a living example of how to practice adultery, a family which embraces pedophiles, an idiot king who had the idea of a global reset, etc.? Common guys...a bit of common sense
For example, the Oath is the one which empowers to judges to have the ability to judge. The 1953 Coronation Oath is a direct contract with queens subjects, and so on. Overall, the Oath is the one who gives power or oblige somebody to do something. There are a lot of people who disavowed and it's not a shame in that. I did it and I'm proud. How to sear allegiance to a family of anything, but moral people, family which enforced slavery for centuries, family full of incestuous marriages, a family which is a living example of how to practice adultery, a family which embraces pedophiles, an idiot king who had the idea of a global reset, etc.? Common guys...a bit of common sense