+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Want to know all the possible outcomes of an FSW application

min2max

Member
May 20, 2015
13
0
Hi,

Does anybody know what all the possible results of an application are?
Only approved/refused or there is anything else?

I heard of some cases where the applicant was banned from entering Canada for two years. Is this applicable for everybody who gets his application not approved?

Thanks.

min2max
 

scylla

VIP Member
Jun 8, 2010
96,547
22,618
Toronto
Category........
Visa Office......
Buffalo
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
28-05-2010
AOR Received.
19-08-2010
File Transfer...
28-06-2010
Passport Req..
01-10-2010
VISA ISSUED...
05-10-2010
LANDED..........
05-10-2010
min2max said:
Hi,

Does anybody know what all the possible results of an application are?
Only approved/refused or there is anything else?

I heard of some cases where the applicant was banned from entering Canada for two years. Is this applicable for everybody who gets his application not approved?

Thanks.

min2max
The ban is for 5 years - not 2 years (it was recently increased). This ban is not for all application refusals. It's for refusals where the application was found to have misrepresentation (i.e. the applicant materially lied in their application - for example said they were single when they were actually married, failed to list past visa refusals, etc.).
 

min2max

Member
May 20, 2015
13
0
scylla said:
The ban is for 5 years - not 2 years (it was recently increased). This ban is not for all application refusals. It's for refusals where the application was found to have misrepresentation (i.e. the applicant materially lied in their application - for example said they were single when they were actually married, failed to list past visa refusals, etc.).
Thank you scylla for your information.

Yes, I also noticed from the recent Act and Regulations that the period of inadmissibility for offense of misrepresentation is now five years.

I was also aware of, for misrepresentation, is for sure applicable for such ban. However, I could not find clear evidence from the Act/Regulations supporting otherwise, i.e, for 'normal' refusal, it's just a refusal and nothing more.