Thanks for pointing this out. I remember now that my contract also started out at 60% but during the second year of my PhD the university modified our contracts to 100% after recognizing that PhD work 100% anyways and no one ever worked outside of the university for the remaining 40%. Having said that, my reference letter explicitly avoided the "full/part-time" nomenclature altogether. It simply states "...... was gainfully employed at the university from 20..-20.. with a gross annual salary of CHF........ His/her duties include but not limited to the following......" Those were the exact words of the letter. I don't see how a letter drafted like that can be construed as misrepresentation.@mohoozee I'm in the same boat as in the thread to which you replied above. I can understand why the term 'part-time' is mentioned. That's so because at some universities, the contract specifically states that the employment is a certain percentage (either 50%/60%/65%) of the full-time employment. That certain percentage equates to the number of hours which the reference letter states. Since a full-time work is usually 40 hours/week in Germany, 50% employment would mean 20 hours/week to start with. This may increase as one progresses through their PhD. Given that my contract did not mention full-time, and that would be misrepresentation if it's written as such in the reference letter, my admin at the university is legally bound to write part-time. Is there any specific reason because of which you mentioned to avoid writing part-time in the letter?
Given that my PhD also lasted for just less than 5 years and was not technically a full-time position, my total PhD work experience adds up to around 3.5 years (or 4680 hrs) as per the calculation on IRCC website. IRCC considers full-time as 30 hours/week (1560 hours/year). Link here -> https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/immigrate-canada/express-entry/eligibility/federal-skilled-workers.html#skilled
Last edited: