kimt487 said:
Sorry but it wouldn't be a no-brainer if she posted the question. Why is it imperative for Americans to apply outland? Can someone please explain this?
Americans can get PR extremely quickly with outland, they literally have the easiest path to PR out of all the countries in the world. They also can enter Canada extremely easily with no visa and a significant majority have no issues entering. Also since US is literally next to Canada, US applicants have very short flight times to go see their spouses. Outland applicants can also stay in Canada as a visitor while having PR app processed. It's a luxury Americans and many other visa exempt nationals have, unlike for most people from poorer countries who are usually refused a visitor visa and forced to live apart.
Inland is a horrific choice, as it would force Americans to wait almost 2 years for PR, they would not be able to leave the country for any reason, even for family emergencies or vacations. Inlanders are essentially "trapped" in Canada.
Any American applying inland is making a terrible mistake.
Even for my wife's application, we didn't want to go inland despite her country having an average processing time of 2 years for OUTLAND. It was a terrific decision, as she got her PR in 6 months with outland, rather than waiting 2 years in Canada.
I just noticed that you're actually an American who tried applying inland. In a way, maybe this refusal is good for you, because at least you can start over and go outland this time. You will become a PR in 3-6 months this way, and you don't even need to be away from Canada while going outland. You can just enter as a visitor and apply outland.