Hi guys,
I have received my notes few hours ago. Requested on the 9th of May, generated on May 11th. Would be glad if you could leave your feedback and comments.
ASSESSMENTS
Eligibility: Recommend Passed
Security: Not Started
HIRV:
Criminality: Passed
Org Crime:
Medical: Passed
Misrepresentation:
Other Reqs:
Well, since few hours ago I had never seen "Recommend Passed" till I read MrTee above. I don't know what's the difference with passed and met, but I think that if a review has been or will be required, the case analyst leave his comment on eligibility as he recommends passed or not. Or may be it is the nomenclature that prefers each agent (Met, passed, recommend passed). MrTee, if you don't mind, could you tell me the code of the agent who worked on your 11.2, so may be we could know something on it.
Having analysed this application based on the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the application, I have made the following recommendation: ANALYST RECOMMENDATION: Recommend Pass A11.2: Appears met 75. (2) FSW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS- Appear met 76(1)(a) SELECTION CRITERIA- FSW POINTS: Appear met FSW points total: 75 Ready to finalize RPRF: Complete Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) CRS points at invitation to apply (ITA): 461 CRS minimum score for round: 461 Current CRS score: 461 I have reviewed the following for CRS points: PA gained points as Single at ITA and APR PA gained points for 3 years foreign work experience with *******: . No trace other than present application.. No adverse information. FAMILY COMPOSITION . Single; Never married; . No indication of previous marriages; . No children indicated.. All MEDS valid for 3 months or more.. All PASSPORTS valid for 3 months or more. ARRANGED EMPLOYMENT OFFER: 0 Primary Occupation: NOC 1111 Financial auditors and accountants 75. (2) FSW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS- Appear met Aug2011 to Aug2012 — *****— at ******eDoc ******Submitted reference letter dated 31Dec2015 confirms applicant's employment in declared occupation throughout specified period, and describes duties which are consistent with the lead statement and main duties as set out in the selected NOC category.. Reference letter confirms full-time employment; 1 year of full-time work experience have been accumulated. WORK EXPERIENCE: 9 ADAPTABILITY: 0 FSW points SETTLEMENT FUNDS . More than CAD$12.164..
Finally I have noticed that my R10 has been checked very late (On 21/04, so more than 3 months from AOR), don't know why because at the first check (on 12/01) everything looks ok.
*** AGENT REVIEW *** Meets R10 Requirements POLICE CERTIFICATES All police certificates on application;
following PC's NRT - Tunisia & Italy. Criminality Decision Passed. EDUCATION DOCUMENTS ECA report verified on issuing agency website; foreign credential confirmed on ECA site. ECA Canadian Equivalency Summary reported by issuing agency WES as Bachelor's ( 4 yrs). Credential is consistent with level of education claimed by PA under EE Eligibility. AGE Applicant's age reviewed and no change from ITA to e-APR.
And here is the first comment at the 12/01/2016
REVIEW TYPE: Support Service Agent APPLICATION: E********* REGULATION: FSW I have reviewed this
application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file and note the following. EXPRESS ENTRY - APPLICATION SENT FOR R10 REVIEW MIN Score: 461 - ITA Score: 461 PRINCIPAL APPLICANT APPLICATION PROMOTED: New UCI Created REVIEW NOTES FOR REPRESENTATIVE: NO Representation MEDICAL ATTACHED TO UCI: Yes CLIENT FEES: Paid PA HAS CANADIAN EDUCATION CREDENTIALS: No PA HAS ECA WITH ACCOMPANYING FOREIGN CREDENTIALS: Yes LANGUAGES: Principal Applicant: - English: IELTS - Received: Met Threshold and Verified - French: TEF - Received: Met Threshold and Verified DOCUMENTS SET FOR REVIEW: EDUCATION, PROOF OF FUNDS, POLICE CERT
Last activity on my application has been on the 30/04 with A11.2 review. File has been assigned to another agent with a due date 29/05/2016. Did not receive any ghost mail at that date nor on the 30/04/2016 when A11.2 has been performed.
Would like to ask you if I should send the revised report of my ECA or no. In fact, As I read many people arguing that to claim two or more degrees, they should be written on the summary, I asked WES few days ago to update my report writing my two degrees instead of one (two bachelor's indeed) but now I see from notes that my ECA has been accepted without problems and my two degrees taking into account. Shall I inform CIC or you think the file moved and no need to it.